Imagine one day, a certain tech giant really develops a Quantum Computer that can instantly crack RSA Secret Keys, and hackers get their hands on it. What will happen then?
The account security of traditional banking systems could collapse directly. SWIFT cross-border transfers may be intercepted, credit card data could be compromised, and the entire fiat currency system will undergo an unprecedented credit shock. Wall Street may come to a standstill due to a technological panic.
But what about blockchain? This is where it gets interesting.
Stablecoins like USDD that operate on high-performance public chains such as Tron have inherently stronger anti-quantum resilience due to their underlying hash algorithms (such as SHA-256). More importantly — smart contracts can be upgraded. Once a threat truly approaches, DAO governance can rapidly initiate proposals to migrate the core contracts to anti-quantum signature algorithms. This kind of code flexibility is something that bank systems still clinging to decades-old COBOL cannot compare with.
With the transparent over-collateralization mechanism and price stability module, the value of this type of stablecoin is guaranteed by mathematical consistency rather than the security of a bank's database. Once quantum panic occurs, funds will instinctively flow towards these assets that are "mathematically certain."
In simple terms, when traditional finance is paralyzed by technological panic, the agility of blockchain has become the biggest moat.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoodFollowsPrice
· 2025-12-22 14:52
Ha, this logic is a bit wild. Quantum cracking RSA is naively here, bank systems die, stablecoins thrive? It sounds like someone is trying to fixer some coins.
View OriginalReply0
faded_wojak.eth
· 2025-12-22 14:48
Is the banking system really that fragile? It feels a bit exaggerated... But speaking of which, Quantum Computing is indeed a hidden danger.
View OriginalReply0
ThreeHornBlasts
· 2025-12-22 14:47
Wait, if TRON can upgrade contracts, can it resist quantum attacks? This logic seems a bit forced... The banking system should have implemented redundancy and backups long ago, how could it just collapse like that?
View OriginalReply0
OnlyOnMainnet
· 2025-12-22 14:43
If the banking system really gets hacked, those old-timers are still using COBOL, while the Blockchain has already used DAO to bail-in with a vote... the gap is a bit extreme.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 2025-12-22 14:37
nah this is giving major "hypothetical cope" vibes... SHA-256 still gets rekt by actual quantum breaks, dao governance isn't faster than a bank upgrade lol. pattern analysis suggests this is classic marketing narrative for stablecoins 📊
Imagine one day, a certain tech giant really develops a Quantum Computer that can instantly crack RSA Secret Keys, and hackers get their hands on it. What will happen then?
The account security of traditional banking systems could collapse directly. SWIFT cross-border transfers may be intercepted, credit card data could be compromised, and the entire fiat currency system will undergo an unprecedented credit shock. Wall Street may come to a standstill due to a technological panic.
But what about blockchain? This is where it gets interesting.
Stablecoins like USDD that operate on high-performance public chains such as Tron have inherently stronger anti-quantum resilience due to their underlying hash algorithms (such as SHA-256). More importantly — smart contracts can be upgraded. Once a threat truly approaches, DAO governance can rapidly initiate proposals to migrate the core contracts to anti-quantum signature algorithms. This kind of code flexibility is something that bank systems still clinging to decades-old COBOL cannot compare with.
With the transparent over-collateralization mechanism and price stability module, the value of this type of stablecoin is guaranteed by mathematical consistency rather than the security of a bank's database. Once quantum panic occurs, funds will instinctively flow towards these assets that are "mathematically certain."
In simple terms, when traditional finance is paralyzed by technological panic, the agility of blockchain has become the biggest moat.