#比特币价格波动 The big dump in mid-October was actually a complete reshuffling of the market cost structure.
According to the on-chain data released by Murphy, long-term holders are engaging in an unprecedented level of distribution. Particularly in the cost range of 60,000 to 70,000, the selling pressure is frightening—those who hoarded chips before the election are now seeing profit pullbacks, and even the most confident individuals are starting to reduce their positions. This is not called adjusting positions; this is called a collapse of consensus.
What’s even more distressing is the price range of 70,000 to 80,000, which now feels like a vacuum zone. Only 190,000 BTC are stuck there. Imagine: if the price really drops to this point, there’s essentially nothing in the market to stop it. It could either plunge straight down or it would need new buying pressure to support a rebound. But who would dare to take over now? Those in profit are frantically unloading, while those in loss are holding on tightly. What about the group whose cost is between 100,000 and 110,000? They’re completely unmoved. What are they betting on? Most likely waiting for an even more severe drop.
To speak frankly: the essence of this fall is not just an ordinary correction. Long-term holders are fleeing on a large scale, reflecting a deep unease about the macro situation—threats from quantum technology, policy uncertainties, and liquidity drying up... These underlying worries are eroding people's confidence in their holdings. On the surface, the distribution of chips appears balanced, but there are undercurrents beneath. Once all long-term holders have exited and the cost structure has completely shifted upward, if it breaks below 80,000, this strong support level, panic will not merely be an emotional issue, but will evolve into a chain sale of chips.
How to deal with this? Don't expect any bottom-fishing myths anymore, just honestly watch how the chips are flowing. Let's see if 70,000 to 80,000 can hold; the key is whether real money is coming in to take over. If it can't quickly stop the fall, it indicates that the bottom hasn't been reached yet, and the cost reconstruction is far from over. If things go poorly, the subsequent liquidity crisis could be even more terrifying. A bull market needs new consensus to support it, and the current problem is that the old consensus is rapidly collapsing.
The last sentence is for you: what’s truly terrifying is not the price falling down, but that you have no idea who else is willing to stubbornly hold on with you.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFT_Therapy_Group
· 2025-12-25 07:57
Long-term holders are running away, and now there's a real possibility that 80,000 could be broken. It still feels like the bottom is far away.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 2025-12-25 06:06
Long-term holders have all sold out, this wave really hurts. 70,000-80,000 feels like a trap, no one dares to take the bait.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 2025-12-24 07:45
Hmm... Long-term holders are selling off, this thing is indeed a bit concerning.
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 2025-12-23 09:40
It's the same old analysis of chips, which is correct but gives me a headache. Long-term holders are rug pulling, consensus is collapsing... Why not just say it's playing people for suckers?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 2025-12-22 09:21
Here comes the story of washing chips again, it's making me dizzy. Long-term holders are rug pulling, this time it's really collapsing the consensus, not the sort of adjustment that's just talked about...
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 2025-12-22 09:21
Long-term holders are all running away, who the hell dares to catch a falling knife now... If it really breaks 70 to 80 thousand, the chain reaction will be terrifying.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinator
· 2025-12-22 09:20
Long-term holders are really fleeing, just look at this terrifying sell pressure... I'm really a bit worried about this vacuum zone of 70-80k, who will catch a falling knife?
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 2025-12-22 09:20
This wave indeed looks terrifying, 70,000 to 80,000 really feels like a line, once it breaks, it may not come back.
With the long-term holders smashing down, those in between are all betting on lower prices, no one dares to catch a falling knife.
To put it bluntly, those buying now are just cushioning for the upcoming big dump.
The bottom hasn’t formed yet, the consensus is shattered, just continue to wait.
The long-term holders rug pulling is the biggest signal, this is not an adjustment.
This time is indeed different, just looking at the flow of chips can feel that sense of despair.
At the end of September, they were still shouting that 100,000 wouldn’t break, now they are all silent, interesting.
If 80,000 can’t hold, it’s really game over, the market has no catch a falling knife ability.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 2025-12-22 09:18
To be honest, the 70,000 to 80,000 vacuum zone is the real knife edge; if no one dares to catch a falling knife, it will be over.
View OriginalReply0
MintMaster
· 2025-12-22 09:13
Wow, this wave is really Large Investors pulling out, anyone would panic in this vacuum zone of 70,000 to 80,000.
The collective escape of long-term holders indicates that something big is happening, and the quantum technology aspect is truly frightening.
Not finding anyone to catch a falling knife at the bottom is the most terrifying part.
It seems we have to wait for a new Consensus to emerge; otherwise, holding on stubbornly is meaningless.
Instead of buying the dip, it's better to carefully watch how the chips are moving.
#比特币价格波动 The big dump in mid-October was actually a complete reshuffling of the market cost structure.
According to the on-chain data released by Murphy, long-term holders are engaging in an unprecedented level of distribution. Particularly in the cost range of 60,000 to 70,000, the selling pressure is frightening—those who hoarded chips before the election are now seeing profit pullbacks, and even the most confident individuals are starting to reduce their positions. This is not called adjusting positions; this is called a collapse of consensus.
What’s even more distressing is the price range of 70,000 to 80,000, which now feels like a vacuum zone. Only 190,000 BTC are stuck there. Imagine: if the price really drops to this point, there’s essentially nothing in the market to stop it. It could either plunge straight down or it would need new buying pressure to support a rebound. But who would dare to take over now? Those in profit are frantically unloading, while those in loss are holding on tightly. What about the group whose cost is between 100,000 and 110,000? They’re completely unmoved. What are they betting on? Most likely waiting for an even more severe drop.
To speak frankly: the essence of this fall is not just an ordinary correction. Long-term holders are fleeing on a large scale, reflecting a deep unease about the macro situation—threats from quantum technology, policy uncertainties, and liquidity drying up... These underlying worries are eroding people's confidence in their holdings. On the surface, the distribution of chips appears balanced, but there are undercurrents beneath. Once all long-term holders have exited and the cost structure has completely shifted upward, if it breaks below 80,000, this strong support level, panic will not merely be an emotional issue, but will evolve into a chain sale of chips.
How to deal with this? Don't expect any bottom-fishing myths anymore, just honestly watch how the chips are flowing. Let's see if 70,000 to 80,000 can hold; the key is whether real money is coming in to take over. If it can't quickly stop the fall, it indicates that the bottom hasn't been reached yet, and the cost reconstruction is far from over. If things go poorly, the subsequent liquidity crisis could be even more terrifying. A bull market needs new consensus to support it, and the current problem is that the old consensus is rapidly collapsing.
The last sentence is for you: what’s truly terrifying is not the price falling down, but that you have no idea who else is willing to stubbornly hold on with you.