The Hong Kong insurance regulatory authority has recently taken significant action. According to the latest proposal, they plan to open investment channels for insurance funds, including emerging asset classes such as Crypto Assets and infrastructure.
How exactly should it be regulated? The regulatory framework clearly defines Crypto Assets - managed according to a 100% risk capital provisioning standard, which means that insurance institutions need to hold sufficient risk reserves when investing in Crypto Assets. On the other hand, the regulations for stablecoins are more flexible and will apply corresponding risk capital requirements based on the type of fiat currency each stablecoin is pegged to.
This plan appears to be quite detailed from the documents, as it opens up investment space while controlling risks through a differentiated risk management framework. For insurance institutions, there is finally a clear policy guideline; for the Crypto Assets market, this also represents the gradual entry of traditional financial institutions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenTherapist
· 10h ago
This method in Hong Kong is good; the entry of insurance funds can indeed stabilize the market in the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLucky
· 10h ago
This move in Hong Kong is quite good; the entry of insurance funds means that big money is really coming in, not just retail investor-level FOMO.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 11h ago
The recent operations in Hong Kong are quite stable, with a 100% risk reserve not being too aggressive, at least leaving a way for institutions to enter the market.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKing
· 11h ago
Wow, this operation in Hong Kong is quite interesting. Insurance funds are coming in to fleece the encryption market? 100% risk reserve, these traditional financial bigwigs are the real fleece gang. We retail investors need to keep a close eye on our Wallet Address and not get drained by the institutions.
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anon
· 11h ago
The recent operations in Hong Kong are quite good, the 100% risk provision threshold is tough enough, and insurance institutions need to do their homework to engage in Cryptocurrency Trading.
The Hong Kong insurance regulatory authority has recently taken significant action. According to the latest proposal, they plan to open investment channels for insurance funds, including emerging asset classes such as Crypto Assets and infrastructure.
How exactly should it be regulated? The regulatory framework clearly defines Crypto Assets - managed according to a 100% risk capital provisioning standard, which means that insurance institutions need to hold sufficient risk reserves when investing in Crypto Assets. On the other hand, the regulations for stablecoins are more flexible and will apply corresponding risk capital requirements based on the type of fiat currency each stablecoin is pegged to.
This plan appears to be quite detailed from the documents, as it opens up investment space while controlling risks through a differentiated risk management framework. For insurance institutions, there is finally a clear policy guideline; for the Crypto Assets market, this also represents the gradual entry of traditional financial institutions.