The South Korean Central Bank has launched the second round of CBDC testing, considering the distribution of government subsidies using digital money.

robot
Abstract generation in progress

The Bank of Korea recently issued a formal notice for the second round of CBDC testing to major banks. Central Bank officials revealed that specific implementation details and timelines are still under further discussion.

This round of testing has an interesting angle - the Central Bank intends to distribute a portion of government subsidies in the form of digital currency. What are the benefits of doing this? First, it allows for precise control over the usage scenarios of the subsidies, and second, it can significantly reduce the management and administrative costs in the process of distributing the subsidies.

In fact, the Central Bank of Korea had already promoted a CBDC pilot project in April of this year, with seven banks participating, which lasted for three months. However, that pilot was later suspended. The reasons for this are quite realistic, as the actual application value of the project was deemed limited, and it placed a cost pressure of billions of Korean won on the participating banks, attracting considerable criticism.

Whether this second round of testing can better demonstrate the practicality of Central Bank Digital Currency depends on the subsequent implementation effects.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ProposalManiacvip
· 2025-12-23 23:20
The first round lost billions without figuring out the rules, and now here comes the second round... this game theory logic is a bit hard to sustain. --- Precise control of subsidy usage? Simply put, it means wanting to put a cage around it, but the question is who will verify that this mechanism design itself is sound. --- The banks are in complete loss and have come to a standstill, and now they want them to proceed? They need to come up with some real monetary incentive-compatible plans. --- Historical lessons are right here; trying to push for a second round without sufficient cost-benefit analysis feels a bit like rushing to a listing. --- Rather than testing CBDC, it’s better to first design the governance framework; otherwise, it’s just burning money looking for problems. --- The South Korean Central Bank's approach—first pausing public opinion, then quietly moving to the second round—definitely qualifies as "mechanism design."
View OriginalReply0
CexIsBadvip
· 2025-12-23 13:52
Here we go again with CBDC, this time using subsidies as test subjects, quite ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentSagevip
· 2025-12-22 20:36
Here we go again, still messing around with CBDC? Last time so much cost went down the drain, do they dare to come again this time? The Bank of Korea is really...
View OriginalReply0
StillBuyingTheDipvip
· 2025-12-21 13:00
Here comes another round, I haven't learned that trap from last time yet.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaMillionairen'tvip
· 2025-12-21 13:00
Here we go again, trying to use subsidies to "validate" the value of CBDC? Last time it cost tens of billions of won, can we not mess with the banks this time?
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapyvip
· 2025-12-21 12:53
Here we go again, is this another trap for subsidies to be used specifically? It feels like an excuse to find application scenarios for Central Bank Digital Money.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)