2025-12-21 11:20:16

The experience of on-chain games is quite good, and the rebate mechanism is also considerable. But to be honest - these types of games are essentially gambling, and I myself ended up losing money. However, one good point is that there is a self-betting function, and the operation experience is smooth enough, which helps with Risk Management. Speaking of chain selection, Abstract's performance in the gaming ecosystem is indeed outstanding, and its compatibility is quite high.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletDetective

· 2025-12-24 11:19

Playing resulted in a huge loss, but the experience was indeed smooth... To put it simply, it's still a gamble; no matter how good the rebate is, it can't recover the blood. Abstract, this chain really packs a punch; the ecosystem adaptation is unmatched.

View OriginalReply0

HashBrownies

· 2025-12-24 10:45

Basically, it's just a scam to harvest new investors. I learned my lesson the hard way. The chain itself is actually pretty good, but losing money is the real goal. No matter how high the rebate, it can't make up for my recent mistake. GG. A smooth experience is useless if the money is gone, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

· 2025-12-24 05:32

I have experience with losing money; no matter how high the rebate is, it can't fill this hole.

View OriginalReply0

MEV_Whisperer

· 2025-12-23 20:36

To put it bluntly, it's a gambling game, and I've also lost a lot.

View OriginalReply0

SocialFiQueen

· 2025-12-21 11:50

To be honest, blockchain games are just gambling in disguise; no matter how it's packaged, this essence doesn't change. After playing Abstract for so long, it indeed runs smoothly, but the speed of losing money is even smoother, haha. The rebate mechanism looks attractive, but in the end, the money still ends up in the project party's pocket. The self-ranking feature is nice; at least it allows one to deceive themselves into thinking they are "managing risk."

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 2025-12-21 11:43

According to on-chain data, the loss rate for this type of game is about 62%, and the author's experience just confirms this statistic. The self-ranking mechanism design is interesting, but essentially it is still optimizing the gambling experience rather than changing its financial attributes. The adaptability of Abstract is indeed worth following; from the perspective of TVL growth, the attractiveness of its gaming ecosystem is rising. Losing money is just losing money; at least the UI/UX experience is not disappointing, much better than the lag of some chains. Based on actual trading experience, this type of rebate mechanism is usually designed to look "very generous, but the actual recoup investment probability is extremely low." It feels like Abstract is really building an ecosystem this time, rather than just a simple marketing concept hype. To be honest, the better the risk management tools for chain games are, the more it indicates that the team knows how dangerous this thing is.

View OriginalReply0

DefiOldTrickster

· 2025-12-21 11:34

Haha, losing money and still playing here? I used to mess around like this too, now I only look at returns. --- Abstract's ecosystem is indeed well-managed, but that rebate mechanism is just a way to play people for suckers. --- No matter how smooth the self-ordering function is, it doesn't change the essence of gambling, brother. I suggest you study reinvestment strategies; it's much better than this stuff. --- That's why I stubbornly stick to arbitrage; I've long crossed out game-related stuff. --- Realizing that this is gambling is already good enough, young people need to suffer more to get enlightened. --- To be honest, Abstract's adaptability is indeed impressive, but the underlying aspect is still gambling, so don't deceive yourself. --- Is the rebate mechanism impressive? How come I haven't noticed it, as soon as the liquidation price hits, it still plays people for suckers. --- On-chain data looks good, but players are still losing money.

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 2025-12-21 11:33

To be honest, these types of games are just re-skinned gambling, and I've lost money too. The Abstract ecology is indeed good, but don't be fooled by the rebates. After playing around, I finally understood that it ultimately relies on luck. The self-selection feature doesn't help much; the key is not to go all in.

View OriginalReply0

BrokenYield

· 2025-12-21 11:31

nah the "smooth ux" doesn't mask the systemic risk here... paid to realize onchain gaming is just ponzinomics with better ui. Abstract's liquidity depth won't save you from the correlation matrix collapse when it comes.

Reply0