Took a closer look at how this identity infrastructure is actually structured, and honestly—it's refreshing to see something that breaks from the usual identity project template.
The architecture caught my attention: Network layer handling the foundation, Integration layer bridging ecosystems, and Application layer where users actually interact. It's a three-tier stack that actually feels coherent instead of just slapping components together.
What really stands out is the data philosophy underneath: users maintain ownership of their data, and applications request permission rather than demanding access. That's the flip of how most platforms operate today.
It raises the question—why hasn't crypto prioritized this model sooner? Data sovereignty should've been table stakes from the beginning.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MeltdownSurvivalist
· 20h ago
Data sovereignty should indeed be addressed sooner; it's a bit late to be pondering it now.
View OriginalReply0
Web3ExplorerLin
· 20h ago
hypothesis: this three-layer thing actually mirrors how ancient trade routes worked... except instead of silk, we're moving data sovereignty around. ngl, the permission model flipping the script is wild—every platform suddenly looks like digital feudalism in comparison. why did it take us this long to remember users should own their stuff tho? 🤔
Reply0
SnapshotDayLaborer
· 20h ago
Data sovereignty has indeed been overlooked for too long, but to be honest, designing it well is one thing, and whether users are willing to pay for it is another.
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anon
· 20h ago
Data sovereignty is indeed something that has been thought about for a long time, but the problem is that most projects have no intention of truly giving power to the users... Who would be willing under the drive of interests?
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 20h ago
Data sovereignty should indeed be popularized sooner, but to be honest, there are quite a few projects that are just now figuring it out... The three-layer architecture looks clean, but I fear it might just be another flashy vaporware.
Took a closer look at how this identity infrastructure is actually structured, and honestly—it's refreshing to see something that breaks from the usual identity project template.
The architecture caught my attention: Network layer handling the foundation, Integration layer bridging ecosystems, and Application layer where users actually interact. It's a three-tier stack that actually feels coherent instead of just slapping components together.
What really stands out is the data philosophy underneath: users maintain ownership of their data, and applications request permission rather than demanding access. That's the flip of how most platforms operate today.
It raises the question—why hasn't crypto prioritized this model sooner? Data sovereignty should've been table stakes from the beginning.