I was completely frozen when I saw that news last night - someone lost 50 million USDT in a phishing attack in an instant. Even more outrageous, the victim was "negotiating" with the hacker on-chain and issued an ultimatum of "refund 98% within 48 hours." I instinctively opened my Wallet to verify, and my palms were sweaty.

At that moment, I suddenly thought: If my assets were converted into another stablecoin form, would I sleep more soundly?

In simple terms, security cannot just be an additional feature; it must be the foundation of the entire system.

This incident has exposed a painful reality – in a decentralized world, whether assets can be preserved depends on individual vigilance. A single misclick or a careless authorization can wipe out years of savings. When we discuss stablecoins, we often think about "whether the price is stable," but the real question is often overlooked: who is actually guarding my money?

This is why some stablecoins chose a different path from the beginning. For example, by adopting an over-collateralization model—every dollar you have must be backed by real assets, such as BTC or TRX. All collateral data is displayed on-chain, and anyone can check it at any time. This eliminates the possibility of any "black box operations." Compared to those centrally issued stablecoins, the transparency itself forms a security barrier.

In addition to the decentralized autonomous operation logic - not relying on a single centralized institution, but maintained collectively by distributed DAO nodes. Even if a hacker breaks through a point, it cannot change the overall situation, as the system has sufficient resilience to self-correct. There is no risk of a "fatal" single point of failure.

These are the things that can truly help us sleep soundly.