What happened after 500 BTC were transferred to a stolen address - A mining pool insider's experience of private key leakage risk

robot
Abstract generation in progress

[Chain News] A senior co-founder of a mining pool recently shared a thrilling experience regarding Private Key security. Last year, he suspected that his Private Key might have been leaked, but he did not dare to completely confirm whether this Address was truly controlled by a Hacker. To verify the truth, he made a bold decision - he transferred 500 Bitcoins to this suspicious Address.

The outcome was unexpected. The hackers did not empty the account all at once. These “uninvited guests” only took away 490 Bitcoins, unexpectedly leaving him with 10. According to him, these 10 Bitcoins “are enough to make a living.”

This case may sound like dark humor, but what it reflects is the most painful risk of crypto assets - once the Private Key is leaked, your assets are exposed to Hackers and are defenseless. Interestingly, the logic behind Hacker behavior is also worth pondering; perhaps they have their own “moral bottom line”? Or is this itself an extension of some phishing scheme? In any case, this story reminds everyone: the security of the Private Key is no trivial matter.

BTC0.05%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
APY_Chaservip
· 12h ago
This guy is really ruthless, using 500 BTC as bait... the hacker left 10, which is really amazing, haha.
View OriginalReply0
NervousFingersvip
· 12h ago
Wow, this guy is really bold, using 500 BTC for fishing verification... the hacker left 10 for him to "make a living", is this compassion or some kind of twisted logic?
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrunvip
· 12h ago
This guy is really ruthless, using 500 BTC as bait for a test, and the hacker leaving 10 is considered courteous? However, I think this looks more like trying to catch a bigger fish, so we have to be more careful in the future.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeNomadvip
· 12h ago
ngl this is either the most expensive security audit ever or a sophisticated honeypot setup disguised as negligence. the "leaving 10 btc behind" angle doesn't track with standard exploit postmortems i've studied... feels like misdirection. real compromised keys? attackers drain immediately, no theatrical breadcrumbs left behind.
Reply0
MeaninglessGweivip
· 12h ago
Huh? Sending 500 BTC directly for verification? This guy really has guts... But claiming that 10 BTC can sustain a living is truly ridiculous. Did the hacker leave 10 BTC for him as a mockery or is there really a bottom line? What a clever question to ask. Once the Private Key is leaked, this is the outcome. Wake up, everyone. How can one dare to directly throw in 500 for a test? Isn't that just handing over the goods? This story sounds like dark humor, but it is indeed a warning signal. Is there a principle for hackers? Leaving 10 Bitcoin as a fig leaf? So the current question is whether Private Key management or exchange risk is greater. No, why transfer 500 to an address suspected of being controlled... I really can't make sense of this logic. This operation is no different from a suicidal verification... The phishing scheme extension sounds a bit interesting, but it still feels off somewhere.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)