In early November, a trader faced an extreme dilemma: the account had 80,000 U in leveraged contract holdings, with unrealized losses of 2,580 USD on ETH long orders and 6,110 USD on BTC long orders, approaching the liquidation price. This fund was actually the payment for suppliers at the end of the year, and the pressure was unimaginable.

Entering too aggressively with leverage as high as 100x. The primary task is to reduce risk—immediately adjust the leverage from 100x to 30x, while simultaneously placing a stop-loss order. The core logic is simple: first ensure the account survives, then talk about recovery.

At three in the morning, ETH suddenly crashed, and users almost wanted to liquidate their positions to stop losses. However, at this critical moment, the risk control system detected a large buy signal from a compliant platform, which usually indicates institutional entry. Decision: continue holding.

The waiting process is torturous, but the market ultimately validated the judgment – reduced holdings by one third when ETH rebounded from 3377 to 3450; fully liquidated at 3520 on November 8. The account not only stopped losses but also achieved a profit of 3700 USD.

Smoother operations ahead: ASTER rose from 1.05 to 1.32, and ZEC increased from 580 to 640. The account gradually recovered from a minimum of 10,000 U to 90,000 U.

In the end, he said a sentence: "The payment has been settled, we can have a stable year this year." This is not just a number of profits, but also a reward for risk control discipline and respect for the market.