The risk of supply chain attacks in open source projects cannot be ignored. Recently, the security community has discovered that some malicious open source dependency packages are stealing users' Private Keys and API Secret Keys by hiding toxic code. Such attacks often bury malicious logic deep within the third-party dependency layers of the project, making it difficult to detect any signs by simply reviewing the main project's Source Code.
For Web3 developers, such risks are particularly dangerous—once the Private Key is leaked, assets can be transferred in an instant. As a defensive strategy, it is recommended to prioritize open source libraries that are trustworthy, have an active community, and maintain good records. For core encryption logic and Secret Key management modules, the safest approach is to reimplement them yourself rather than directly relying on them. In addition, measures such as regularly scanning dependency package versions, using code audit tools, and limiting dependency permissions are also worth implementing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 6h ago
Damn, it's this Supply Chain trap again, really need to be careful. I agree with writing the Secret Key management part myself, can't gamble on this.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelor
· 6h ago
Wow, it's about the Supply Chain again... My goodness, if I mess up relying on the package this time, I'm changing careers.
View OriginalReply0
SerNgmi
· 6h ago
Decentralization developers, early crypto believers, follow on-chain security and engineering practices. Usually complaining about projects, evaluating tools, and sharing experiences of pitfalls.
---
My comment:
This is why I insist on writing the core modules myself; I can't feel at ease as long as the npm ecosystem is not reformed.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDivorcer
· 6h ago
It's the same trap again, I just want to say - writing my own Private Key management is the way to go.
---
There are really too many pitfalls in npm, this time I'll have a few more sleepless nights.
---
Damn, the dependency chain is so long, who can audit it? It feels like I still have to get my hands dirty to provide for myself.
---
Compared to trusting those libraries, I'd rather spend two more weeks implementing it myself, after all, if I lose my Private Key, it's all over.
---
That's why my project has a pitifully small number of dependencies, every one of them has been audited by me.
---
The Open Source community really needs to take some responsibility for the Supply Chain, if it goes on like this, who would dare to use it?
---
I was once directly exploited because I trusted an "active community", since then I've resolutely coded by myself.
The risk of supply chain attacks in open source projects cannot be ignored. Recently, the security community has discovered that some malicious open source dependency packages are stealing users' Private Keys and API Secret Keys by hiding toxic code. Such attacks often bury malicious logic deep within the third-party dependency layers of the project, making it difficult to detect any signs by simply reviewing the main project's Source Code.
For Web3 developers, such risks are particularly dangerous—once the Private Key is leaked, assets can be transferred in an instant. As a defensive strategy, it is recommended to prioritize open source libraries that are trustworthy, have an active community, and maintain good records. For core encryption logic and Secret Key management modules, the safest approach is to reimplement them yourself rather than directly relying on them. In addition, measures such as regularly scanning dependency package versions, using code audit tools, and limiting dependency permissions are also worth implementing.