#美国就业数据表现强劲超出预期 Quantum Computing approaching, the old Bitcoin Address is in countdown.
Industry insider Nic Carter recently raised a question worth serious consideration: what will happen to early Bitcoin addresses when practical quantum computers emerge?
The data is heart-wrenching—approximately 1.7 million Bitcoins have not moved for a long time globally, and these dormant assets are mainly stored in addresses from the Satoshi Nakamoto era. What's the problem? These addresses use the standard ECDSA signature mechanism, which has no defense against Quantum Computing.
In other words, when the computing power of quantum computers is strong enough, it can theoretically reverse-engineer private keys.
The pressure is considerable. The number of quantum bits in global laboratories is doubling every year, and while the industry generally expects practical quantum computers to still be 5 to 10 years away, upgrading cryptography has become a problem that must be solved. This has created an implied race—upgrading Bitcoin's anti-quantum solutions needs to be completed before the real threat emerges.
If the upgrade is not timely, the consequences are indeed worrisome. It is not only the security issue of those 1.7 million BTC, but more importantly, it will shake the trust foundation of the entire cryptocurrency market. Once the core assumption of "unbreakable" is broken, the trillion-dollar scale of the cryptocurrency asset ecosystem will face repricing.
This is not alarmist. For early holders who are still using old addresses, it is time to prioritize understanding this risk and considering address migration solutions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenSleuth
· 12-21 04:10
Quantum Computing is something that needs to be taken seriously; having 1.7 million BTC sitting there without any movement is indeed a bit concerning.
That said, if Quantum Computers really come, our entire encryption ecosystem will need to be rewritten.
Should the old coin holders consider moving their Address?
The issue raised by Nic Carter is indeed painful; we need to seize the 5 to 10-year window.
Does it sound like creating panic? But the data is right there, it can't be ignored.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImposter
· 12-21 04:03
1.7 million BTC sleeping into the quantum era and can't wake up, this is indeed something to think about.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamer
· 12-21 03:59
Wow, 1.7 million sleeping BTC just got exposed? This is more ridiculous than rat trading.
Early holders need to hurry and enter a position to migrate their Address; otherwise, when quantum computers come out, they'll really become fossils.
But to be honest, 5 to 10 years should be enough for Bitcoin to react, right? It shouldn't be that dire... I hope.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedTwice
· 12-21 03:58
Wow, 1.7 million BTC just lying there, and once quantum comes, it's all over? How desperate must that be?
#美国就业数据表现强劲超出预期 Quantum Computing approaching, the old Bitcoin Address is in countdown.
Industry insider Nic Carter recently raised a question worth serious consideration: what will happen to early Bitcoin addresses when practical quantum computers emerge?
The data is heart-wrenching—approximately 1.7 million Bitcoins have not moved for a long time globally, and these dormant assets are mainly stored in addresses from the Satoshi Nakamoto era. What's the problem? These addresses use the standard ECDSA signature mechanism, which has no defense against Quantum Computing.
In other words, when the computing power of quantum computers is strong enough, it can theoretically reverse-engineer private keys.
The pressure is considerable. The number of quantum bits in global laboratories is doubling every year, and while the industry generally expects practical quantum computers to still be 5 to 10 years away, upgrading cryptography has become a problem that must be solved. This has created an implied race—upgrading Bitcoin's anti-quantum solutions needs to be completed before the real threat emerges.
If the upgrade is not timely, the consequences are indeed worrisome. It is not only the security issue of those 1.7 million BTC, but more importantly, it will shake the trust foundation of the entire cryptocurrency market. Once the core assumption of "unbreakable" is broken, the trillion-dollar scale of the cryptocurrency asset ecosystem will face repricing.
This is not alarmist. For early holders who are still using old addresses, it is time to prioritize understanding this risk and considering address migration solutions.