Ethereum adjusts ecosystem priorities: zkEVM must meet 128-bit security standards by 2026

【BitPush】There’s a noteworthy development—The Ethereum Foundation recently issued a guiding signal to developers. In simple terms, they have decided to stop solely pursuing speed and instead prioritize security.

What’s the reason behind this? Over the past year, zkEVM has indeed demonstrated impressive performance, running extremely fast. But here’s the problem—many solutions are based on some mathematical assumptions that haven’t been fully validated, which theoretically poses a risk of on-chain data being forged. Wait, does that sound pretty scary?

So, the Foundation’s current approach is very clear: moving forward, they will strengthen formal verification, enhance resistance to attacks, and solidify cryptographic security foundations. By 2026, all zkEVMs must achieve a minimum security strength of 128 bits—that’s the security level recognized by mainstream cryptography today.

The Foundation will also provide security review and assessment tools to help projects meet standards. What does this mean? The progress of some scalability projects might slow down or even stall temporarily. But from the Foundation’s perspective, it’s worth it—securing this aspect first ensures resistance to attacks and trustworthiness, which are essential to truly attract institutional clients and high-value applications. After all, who would dare to use a network that’s fast but insecure?

ETH0.33%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiChefvip
· 4h ago
Security outweighs performance; we finally realized it. The previous barbaric growth solutions need to slow down.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKingvip
· 11h ago
Oh no, finally someone is talking about security. I’ve been saying that projects that hype up performance to the sky will eventually crash and burn. The 128-bit security standard before 2026 sounds good in theory, but the pressure is not small. How many can truly meet the standard? Speed doesn’t matter much; once something goes wrong, it’s an immediate wipeout. This time, the foundation has finally hit the pain point. I just want to know how much rework those already running zkEVM solutions will have to do. Honestly, it’s still about solidifying the fundamentals. All those flashy performance metrics are just superficial; security is the real way forward.
View OriginalReply0
TokenCreatorOPvip
· 11h ago
Finally, someone dares to play it safe. I've long been fed up with those flashy TPS metrics. The risk of data being forged is well said; otherwise, one day waking up to find the money gone would be too late to regret. A 128-bit security standard is better to be more strict; anyway, we just focus on making money with confidence. Some projects are going to cry, haha. Queue up and fall behind in progress. This wave, the foundation finally did something reliable.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObservervip
· 11h ago
Is it really too late to catch security vulnerabilities now? Security is indeed important, but the 128-bit standard in 2026... it feels like some projects will be forced to slow down. Why didn't we see the risk of data forgery from the start? Finally someone brought this up; those previous benchmarks were overhyped. 128-bit security strength sounds reliable, but I don't know who might get stuck. How long will formal verification take? The progress bar might have to be pushed back quite a bit. I've long thought some zkEVM solutions are too aggressive; launching without sufficient verification. Now, the expansion arms race will slow down, which might actually be healthier. The trend has shifted from chasing speed to prioritizing security... developers need to readjust their pace. What about the foundation's evaluation tools? We'll only know who's truly capable and who's just pretending then.
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpertvip
· 11h ago
It was about time to do this, otherwise these zkEVM projects are really playing with fire. It's already 2025 and they're still using unverified assumptions. I'm just puzzled why so much capital isn't being scrutinized. The 128-bit security standard sounds strict, but it's worth it compared to being attacked and liquidated. Weren't a few projects previously wiped out because of this?
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggeevip
· 11h ago
Coming back to security again? To be honest, it's just that those previous clone solutions were too reckless. Daring to go on-chain without verifying a bunch of mathematical assumptions? Now it's going to be stuck until 2026. Let's wait for 128-bit security, but probably half of the projects will need to be rebuilt.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)