Crypto applications that bombed three years ago could be tomorrow's winners. Here's the thing—someone who got burned testing something in 2018 or even 2022? That tells you nothing. Market cycles shift, tech matures, adoption grows. What crashed hard back then might hit different now. Don't write off projects just because their early attempts flopped. The timing, team, and conditions have all changed. That's the reality of building in crypto.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Blockblind
· 15h ago
That's right, that's how the cycle works. The trash from that year might turn around this year.
View OriginalReply0
HodlKumamon
· 15h ago
Even in a bear market, you can live with a smile; data is my cure. Statistical significance treats everyone equally, but dollar-cost averaging (DCA) is truly effective.
---
**Comments:**
Based on historical backtest data, the revival rate of failed projects does exist, but the Sharpe ratio often proves otherwise... The key, in the opinion of 熊熊, is not whether the project is dead or alive, but whether the team has truly iterated (ॉ˘ꇴ˘ॉ)
Crypto applications that bombed three years ago could be tomorrow's winners. Here's the thing—someone who got burned testing something in 2018 or even 2022? That tells you nothing. Market cycles shift, tech matures, adoption grows. What crashed hard back then might hit different now. Don't write off projects just because their early attempts flopped. The timing, team, and conditions have all changed. That's the reality of building in crypto.