A prominent macro economist recently weighed in on Bitcoin's prospects within the global financial system, arguing the flagship cryptocurrency faces structural barriers to widespread central bank adoption. The core issue? Transparency of transactions. Unlike traditional reserve assets, Bitcoin's public ledger nature creates friction for sovereign entities—every movement gets recorded and visible, leaving no room for opacity that governments traditionally prefer. More critically, the decentralized architecture means state actors can't simply intervene or reverse transactions once they're settled, eliminating the financial control levers that central banks have grown accustomed to wielding. This fundamental mismatch between Bitcoin's transparency and immutability versus institutional desire for discretion and control suggests major reserve holdings remain unlikely in the foreseeable future. The tension highlights why governments may continue favoring centralized digital currencies they can actually govern rather than adopting Bitcoin as institutional reserves.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ArbitrageBot
· 15h ago
Haha, honestly, it's still a game of power. The government wants things that can be changed at will.
That's what makes Bitcoin the coolest—it's truly valuable because it can't be changed.
They want the benefits of decentralization but also want to retain control—dream on.
Transparency is a nightmare for them; that has never changed.
So in the end, all these CBDCs flood the market—what a pity.
The truth is so simple: whoever can't control it, shouldn't have it.
That's why I've always been steadfast in holding BTC.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 15h ago
Ha, to put it simply, it's just that the authorities don't want to let go. This isn't a Bitcoin issue; they're afraid of losing control.
A prominent macro economist recently weighed in on Bitcoin's prospects within the global financial system, arguing the flagship cryptocurrency faces structural barriers to widespread central bank adoption. The core issue? Transparency of transactions. Unlike traditional reserve assets, Bitcoin's public ledger nature creates friction for sovereign entities—every movement gets recorded and visible, leaving no room for opacity that governments traditionally prefer. More critically, the decentralized architecture means state actors can't simply intervene or reverse transactions once they're settled, eliminating the financial control levers that central banks have grown accustomed to wielding. This fundamental mismatch between Bitcoin's transparency and immutability versus institutional desire for discretion and control suggests major reserve holdings remain unlikely in the foreseeable future. The tension highlights why governments may continue favoring centralized digital currencies they can actually govern rather than adopting Bitcoin as institutional reserves.