It seems like this direction is quite good, but I plan to start with a small amount to test the waters. After observing for a period of time, I will consider increasing the position. This approach is more cautious, after all, market risks are always present.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
screenshot_gains
· 3h ago
A conservative approach, I like it. But to be honest, trying out small amounts now is a bit too cautious; when the market comes, they just can't keep up.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 3h ago
I like the small-scale testing approach; the conservative school of thought never loses out.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoNomics
· 3h ago
*sigh* classic risk-averse position sizing without even understanding your sharpe ratio or sortino metrics. statistically speaking, your "wait and see" approach is just dressed-up loss aversion bias disguised as prudence.
It seems like this direction is quite good, but I plan to start with a small amount to test the waters. After observing for a period of time, I will consider increasing the position. This approach is more cautious, after all, market risks are always present.