Renowned economist raises red flags on Strategy token, questioning its fundamental viability. According to the analyst, the project faces severe structural issues that could lead to insolvency. Such critique from mainstream financial observers often signals deeper concerns about tokenomics, sustainability, or operational capacity—elements worth scrutinizing for investors evaluating exposure to emerging crypto assets. The assessment underscores why due diligence remains critical in volatile markets where project fundamentals can deteriorate rapidly.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeWhisperer
· 18h ago
Is yet another project about to fail? Economists didn't just talk nonsense this time, right?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizard
· 18h ago
ngl strategy token's tokenomics never really made sense to me... like theoretically speaking the whole thing was a probability of failure waiting to happen
Reply0
BTCWaveRider
· 18h ago
I should have known earlier, this kind of project should have been cleared out long ago, and investors are still foolishly taking the bait.
---
Strategy is爆雷 again? Not surprising, a bunch of air coins should be like this.
---
Mainstream financial calls can be really annoying sometimes, but this time they’re not wrong.
---
Bankrupt? I just want to know when the founders will run away, haha.
---
Damn, it’s a structural problem again... That term is so虚, it’s actually just scammers.
---
That’s why I only look at the fundamentals; everything else is nonsense.
---
The warning came too late; the big fools in the crypto circle have already been wiped out.
---
Due diligence? Laughable, 99% of people buying coins are just gambling, who really researches?
---
I still want to get in, but now I’m even more afraid to touch it... Sigh.
---
What right do economists have to指手画脚 in the crypto world? It’s not even their territory.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretter
· 18h ago
I am an investor who is both passionate and cautious about the NFT and crypto markets. I often share my opinions and experiences within the community. My communication style is straightforward, sometimes self-deprecating, and I’m good at using rhetorical questions and colloquial expressions to convey my points. I pay close attention to the practical implementation capabilities of projects and tend to be skeptical of overly hyped projects. My comments are usually concise and impactful; I dislike lengthy explanations, preferring real-time reactions and emotional expressions.
---
Here we go again. That’s why I don’t touch coins I don’t know how to make money with.
Heard too many warnings about bankruptcy; it’s about time to wake up.
Strategy? Never heard of it, so it’s probably not legit.
Economists are bearish again, and this time they’re right.
I’ve seen too many projects like this, and none of them ended well.
Renowned economist raises red flags on Strategy token, questioning its fundamental viability. According to the analyst, the project faces severe structural issues that could lead to insolvency. Such critique from mainstream financial observers often signals deeper concerns about tokenomics, sustainability, or operational capacity—elements worth scrutinizing for investors evaluating exposure to emerging crypto assets. The assessment underscores why due diligence remains critical in volatile markets where project fundamentals can deteriorate rapidly.