The sports business landscape is shifting rapidly. Major League Baseball stands at a critical juncture as it navigates media partnerships with streaming giants, contemplates geographic realignment, and evaluates expansion opportunities that could reshape the league’s footprint. While headlines focus on emerging media deals with broadcasters, the far more complicated challenge lies in managing growth without repeating the missteps of previous decades.
Las Vegas has emerged as a symbol of this strategic crossroads. The Athletics’ groundbreaking for their $1.75 billion, 33,000-seat domed stadium in June 2025 marks a watershed moment—one that demands careful consideration before the league accelerates further expansion plans. Yet questions linger about whether this desert market can sustain a major league franchise, and what relocation assistance and infrastructure will be necessary to ensure long-term success.
The Underlying Complexities: More Than Just Stadium Construction
The Athletics’ departure from Oakland and three-year Sacramento stint reflects broader vulnerabilities within MLB’s current franchise ecosystem. Simultaneously, the Tampa Bay Rays struggle with their own existential crisis. Exclusive negotiations for a $1.7 billion sale (valued at $1.25 billion by Forbes, up from Stuart Sternberg’s $200 million 2004 purchase) mask deeper institutional problems. The Rays have chased a new stadium for nearly 20 years, shuffling between Tampa and St. Petersburg while enduring one of baseball’s most outlandish proposals: splitting a season between Florida and Montreal.
Hurricane Milton’s $60 million damage to Tropicana Field forced an unprecedented solution—playing home games at a Yankees minor league facility. This disaster underscores how fragile single-market franchises become without modern infrastructure. Yet MLB remains committed to keeping baseball in the Tampa Bay region, even as Central West Florida struggles to economically support professional baseball.
The Financial Reality Check: Franchise Values and Revenue Models
The numbers tell a cautionary tale. Average MLB franchise valuation sits at $2.6 billion, yet expansion fee expectations hover near $1 billion—a steep ask for unproven markets. Construction costs for the Las Vegas ballpark have already ballooned from $1.5 billion to $2 billion in just two months of work.
Las Vegas itself presents a paradox. While it’s a growing market, its transient population and entertainment saturation create headwinds. With an average attendance of 29,303 fans per game across MLB in 2025, capturing a sustainable audience requires more than novelty. Owner John Fisher faces the daunting task of building an entirely new fanbase in the Mojave Desert while competing against casinos, shows, and entertainment options in a television market smaller than Milwaukee but larger than Jacksonville.
The Collective Bargaining Storm Ahead
Labor negotiations loom as another obstacle. The current CBA expires December 1, 2026. Owners will push hard for salary cap implementation, claiming escalating payrolls and declining local media revenues threaten profitability. Large-market franchises like the Los Angeles Dodgers and New York Mets have ignored luxury tax penalties, treating them as business costs while spending nine figures annually. Meanwhile, mid-market teams such as the Minnesota Twins and Washington Nationals face pressure from debt burdens, stagnant local revenues, and inability to attract fresh capital.
This creates a two-tiered system where big-market teams ignore cost controls while smaller franchises can’t afford to keep up—a dynamic expansion into new markets would only exacerbate.
What Needs to Change First
Before MLB can responsibly pursue a 32-franchise, eight-division configuration, fundamental structural reforms must occur.
Reimagine Distribution and Access
The death of traditional regional sports networks demands innovation. MLB.TV’s archaic blackout restrictions remain indefensible. North Carolina residents, identified as an expansion target alongside Charlotte and Raleigh, currently fall within Baltimore Orioles, Washington Nationals, Cincinnati Reds, and Atlanta Braves territory. Fans spend hundreds annually on streaming services yet still cannot watch all home games. A modern, direct-to-consumer model must provide genuine affordability and complete access.
Understand New Ownership Economics
Ballpark development has transformed. Today’s stadiums function as multi-use entertainment complexes combining hospitality, retail, residential, and tourism infrastructure. This is far more sophisticated than 1995, when Arizona Diamondbacks and Tampa Bay Devil Rays paid $130 million expansion fees and broke ground in traditional markets with simpler economics.
Future expansion requires owners with deep local market expertise who understand hospitality dynamics, demographic trends, and competitive entertainment landscapes. Las Vegas relocation assistance and infrastructure development exemplify the new baseline—cities must offer comprehensive support packages beyond land and tax incentives.
The Case for Deliberate Strategy Over Hasty Growth
The competitive advantage belongs to leagues that think strategically. Expansion cannot be rushed. Charlotte, Raleigh, Nashville, and other identified candidates deserve serious vetting, not rapid-fire approvals that mirror past miscalculations.
MLB commissioner Rob Manfred and ownership must establish rigorous criteria: demonstrated fan commitment, experienced local ownership groups, financial sustainability models, media market viability, and infrastructure readiness. The $1 billion expansion fee signals exclusivity, but only if MLB enforces genuine standards.
Las Vegas relocation represents both opportunity and warning. The Athletics’ gamble could flourish or falter based on factors largely outside the league’s control. That uncertainty demands humility as MLB considers its next geographic moves. Growth is seductive, but stability—and learning from the Rays’ two-decade stadium saga—should guide expansion policy.
The league’s future depends not on how many franchises it operates, but on how thoughtfully it deploys them.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The Path Forward: MLB's Strategic Balancing Act Between Growth and Stability
The sports business landscape is shifting rapidly. Major League Baseball stands at a critical juncture as it navigates media partnerships with streaming giants, contemplates geographic realignment, and evaluates expansion opportunities that could reshape the league’s footprint. While headlines focus on emerging media deals with broadcasters, the far more complicated challenge lies in managing growth without repeating the missteps of previous decades.
Las Vegas has emerged as a symbol of this strategic crossroads. The Athletics’ groundbreaking for their $1.75 billion, 33,000-seat domed stadium in June 2025 marks a watershed moment—one that demands careful consideration before the league accelerates further expansion plans. Yet questions linger about whether this desert market can sustain a major league franchise, and what relocation assistance and infrastructure will be necessary to ensure long-term success.
The Underlying Complexities: More Than Just Stadium Construction
The Athletics’ departure from Oakland and three-year Sacramento stint reflects broader vulnerabilities within MLB’s current franchise ecosystem. Simultaneously, the Tampa Bay Rays struggle with their own existential crisis. Exclusive negotiations for a $1.7 billion sale (valued at $1.25 billion by Forbes, up from Stuart Sternberg’s $200 million 2004 purchase) mask deeper institutional problems. The Rays have chased a new stadium for nearly 20 years, shuffling between Tampa and St. Petersburg while enduring one of baseball’s most outlandish proposals: splitting a season between Florida and Montreal.
Hurricane Milton’s $60 million damage to Tropicana Field forced an unprecedented solution—playing home games at a Yankees minor league facility. This disaster underscores how fragile single-market franchises become without modern infrastructure. Yet MLB remains committed to keeping baseball in the Tampa Bay region, even as Central West Florida struggles to economically support professional baseball.
The Financial Reality Check: Franchise Values and Revenue Models
The numbers tell a cautionary tale. Average MLB franchise valuation sits at $2.6 billion, yet expansion fee expectations hover near $1 billion—a steep ask for unproven markets. Construction costs for the Las Vegas ballpark have already ballooned from $1.5 billion to $2 billion in just two months of work.
Las Vegas itself presents a paradox. While it’s a growing market, its transient population and entertainment saturation create headwinds. With an average attendance of 29,303 fans per game across MLB in 2025, capturing a sustainable audience requires more than novelty. Owner John Fisher faces the daunting task of building an entirely new fanbase in the Mojave Desert while competing against casinos, shows, and entertainment options in a television market smaller than Milwaukee but larger than Jacksonville.
The Collective Bargaining Storm Ahead
Labor negotiations loom as another obstacle. The current CBA expires December 1, 2026. Owners will push hard for salary cap implementation, claiming escalating payrolls and declining local media revenues threaten profitability. Large-market franchises like the Los Angeles Dodgers and New York Mets have ignored luxury tax penalties, treating them as business costs while spending nine figures annually. Meanwhile, mid-market teams such as the Minnesota Twins and Washington Nationals face pressure from debt burdens, stagnant local revenues, and inability to attract fresh capital.
This creates a two-tiered system where big-market teams ignore cost controls while smaller franchises can’t afford to keep up—a dynamic expansion into new markets would only exacerbate.
What Needs to Change First
Before MLB can responsibly pursue a 32-franchise, eight-division configuration, fundamental structural reforms must occur.
Reimagine Distribution and Access
The death of traditional regional sports networks demands innovation. MLB.TV’s archaic blackout restrictions remain indefensible. North Carolina residents, identified as an expansion target alongside Charlotte and Raleigh, currently fall within Baltimore Orioles, Washington Nationals, Cincinnati Reds, and Atlanta Braves territory. Fans spend hundreds annually on streaming services yet still cannot watch all home games. A modern, direct-to-consumer model must provide genuine affordability and complete access.
Understand New Ownership Economics
Ballpark development has transformed. Today’s stadiums function as multi-use entertainment complexes combining hospitality, retail, residential, and tourism infrastructure. This is far more sophisticated than 1995, when Arizona Diamondbacks and Tampa Bay Devil Rays paid $130 million expansion fees and broke ground in traditional markets with simpler economics.
Future expansion requires owners with deep local market expertise who understand hospitality dynamics, demographic trends, and competitive entertainment landscapes. Las Vegas relocation assistance and infrastructure development exemplify the new baseline—cities must offer comprehensive support packages beyond land and tax incentives.
The Case for Deliberate Strategy Over Hasty Growth
The competitive advantage belongs to leagues that think strategically. Expansion cannot be rushed. Charlotte, Raleigh, Nashville, and other identified candidates deserve serious vetting, not rapid-fire approvals that mirror past miscalculations.
MLB commissioner Rob Manfred and ownership must establish rigorous criteria: demonstrated fan commitment, experienced local ownership groups, financial sustainability models, media market viability, and infrastructure readiness. The $1 billion expansion fee signals exclusivity, but only if MLB enforces genuine standards.
Las Vegas relocation represents both opportunity and warning. The Athletics’ gamble could flourish or falter based on factors largely outside the league’s control. That uncertainty demands humility as MLB considers its next geographic moves. Growth is seductive, but stability—and learning from the Rays’ two-decade stadium saga—should guide expansion policy.
The league’s future depends not on how many franchises it operates, but on how thoughtfully it deploys them.