2025-12-20 19:25:53

Are you also annoyed by large initial purchases from project teams? Some token issuers tend to aggressively buy their own tokens when hype is high, resulting in a chaotic price collapse. Could a leading DEX platform implement a mechanism where if the first buy-in during token issuance exceeds 5% of the total supply, the project's founder rewards are automatically revoked? This could fundamentally curb behaviors aimed at dumping to wash the market. Using economic incentives to restrain market manipulation sounds more scientific, doesn't it?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CoconutWaterBoy

· 2h ago

Another "perfect solution." Relying on mechanisms to restrain human nature every day—wake up. Wherever there are interests, there is always a game.

View OriginalReply0

VirtualRichDream

· 2h ago

That's a good idea, but the 5% figure feels a bit strict; it might also hinder normal projects.

View OriginalReply0

YieldChaser

· 3h ago

It's the same old story, been numb from being cut so many times, a 5% limit can't solve the root problem. --- Exactly, it should be done this way, but does DEX dare to? It cuts off people's income sources. --- No matter how perfect the mechanism, project teams always find a way to bypass it. History always repeats itself. --- Economic incentives? Bro, that's a joke. They've already made a killing from private placements. --- Thinking too idealistically, on-chain regulation can't control this kind of thing at all. --- Damn, finally someone brings this up. Every time, it gets dumped right after entry. So satisfying. --- Instead of changing the mechanism, it's better to improve the intuition of ordinary users. They should learn to read K-line charts. --- DEX will never do this because liquidity pools are the real boss. --- Classic case: the token issuer dumps to wash out chips. You can't stop them. --- As long as there's profit to be made, someone will take risks. Not realistic.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropF5Bro

· 3h ago

This idea sounds good, but the people issuing the tokens have already figured out how to bypass the rules, so it's not that simple. It's called suppressing dumps, but in reality, it's an unending cat-and-mouse game. The 5% figure is also too easy to manipulate in batches. No matter how beautiful the mechanism is, it can't withstand the fact that everything on the chain is code. These people can find vulnerabilities in minutes. Instead of doing this, it's better to just look at the transparency of transaction history. Anyway, I’m not touching new tokens anymore. If this trick really worked, those previous projects wouldn't have performed so badly. Human nature can't be fully prevented. The main thing is that investors need to be more cautious; don't expect DEXs to back you up.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#2025GateYearEndSummary
21.46K Popularity
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWinGoldenBar
28.55K Popularity
#GateLaunchpadKDK
26.89K Popularity
#FedRateCutPrediction
80.1K Popularity
#ETHTrendWatch
191.9K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
MP信托Международный Трастовый Фонд
MC:$3.6KHolders:4
0.17%
2
MCMargin Call
MC:$3.55KHolders:1
0.00%
3
BitpizzaBitpizza
MC:$3.6KHolders:2
0.13%
4
GAIAGAIA
MC:$20.75KHolders:2053
53.96%
5
GMONEYGMONEY
MC:$3.54KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap