In cities with convenient ride-hailing services, is it really worth buying a car or hiring a driver? Just thinking about it, it's not cost-effective.
Vitalik has a profound saying: The taxi model is actually the most crypto-like — direct transactions, on-the-spot settlement, zero verification. Truly peer-to-peer.
In contrast, a major platform's transportation service essentially creates a centralized market. Passengers and drivers both have to accept the platform's rules, rates, and information control. It sounds the same as the logic of CEX — the matchmaker always profits from the middle.
Why are assets like $BTC, $ETH, and $BNB attractive? Ultimately, it's the same philosophy: removing middlemen, replacing trust with technology and consensus. From transportation to financial markets, this underlying logic is universal.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaisyUnicorn
· 7h ago
Oh my god, that's a perfect analogy... The business of middlemen making a profit margin, from Didi to Binance, is essentially the same kind of business.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanKing
· 7h ago
Yes, that's right. Didi's approach is indeed just a CEX in disguise; middlemen never sleep.
View OriginalReply0
DEXRobinHood
· 7h ago
Haha, I love this logic. It's the same vampire logic, just with a different name in a different field to keep on bleeding.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMaster
· 7h ago
The real secret to wealth in taxis is that no one is cutting your leeks... Unlike some centralized platforms, where an algorithm update causes drivers and passengers to suffer. The taxi fare for my three kids can actually support a car, and that's the real issue.
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigFailMaster
· 7h ago
Wow, Didi's whole setup is indeed a centralized exchange. How did I not realize that?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 7h ago
Hmm… this logic is indeed perfect; middlemen are always the biggest black holes.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainUndercover
· 7h ago
Wait a minute, there's a bit of a problem with this logic. Didi has long ceased to be truly peer-to-peer...
In cities with convenient ride-hailing services, is it really worth buying a car or hiring a driver? Just thinking about it, it's not cost-effective.
Vitalik has a profound saying: The taxi model is actually the most crypto-like — direct transactions, on-the-spot settlement, zero verification. Truly peer-to-peer.
In contrast, a major platform's transportation service essentially creates a centralized market. Passengers and drivers both have to accept the platform's rules, rates, and information control. It sounds the same as the logic of CEX — the matchmaker always profits from the middle.
Why are assets like $BTC, $ETH, and $BNB attractive? Ultimately, it's the same philosophy: removing middlemen, replacing trust with technology and consensus. From transportation to financial markets, this underlying logic is universal.