Back then, the entire market was full of vitality—banned, surrounded, and ridiculed. Every month, someone would declare Bitcoin dead, but it never truly died. Holders were mocked as lunatics, but that persistence instead gathered true believers.
Now everything has changed. Politicians started to show muscle, competing to declare how "crypto-friendly" they are. Regulatory agencies stopped the crackdown and instead talked about "clear regulatory frameworks." Institutional capital flooded in, turning this movement into part of asset allocation.
In the wild growth period of the past, the very fact that it was not recognized by the mainstream was what made it most attractive. Today, the ecosystem is mature, politically correct, and制度完善—it's hard to say whether it's progress or some kind of compromise. The genuine spirit of risking everything for conviction seems to be gradually fading away.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseLandlord
· 20h ago
Yeah, the innocent days are gone forever.
After institutions came in, it changed. To put it nicely, it's maturity; actually, it's domestication.
We can never go back to the feeling of being doubted by the whole world yet still坚持hodl.
Now it's all about political correctness and asset allocation, it's boring.
I miss the enthusiasm of those times, really.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-afe07a92
· 20h ago
Wake up, everything is now TradFiized. What faith are we still talking about?
Damn, it's been over since Wall Street entered the scene, only some people refuse to admit it.
Politicians jumping on the bandwagon... hilarious, this is just the beginning of domestication.
It's truly a generation, back then being called crazy was actually cooler.
Once institutions come in, it's over. Becoming part of pension funds, what do you call that, a movement?
The pure era is dead; now it's just a financial game.
View OriginalReply0
DataChief
· 20h ago
That early group of people were truly believers, now they're all just businessmen.
Politicians embracing crypto is just for votes; don't take it too seriously.
When institutions enter the scene, it means the story is over; the purity is gone.
Honestly, it's all about money; idealism has long been packaged and sold.
This is the fate of all movements—once they become popular, they lose their original flavor.
Do you remember the purer days of cryptocurrency?
Back then, the entire market was full of vitality—banned, surrounded, and ridiculed. Every month, someone would declare Bitcoin dead, but it never truly died. Holders were mocked as lunatics, but that persistence instead gathered true believers.
Now everything has changed. Politicians started to show muscle, competing to declare how "crypto-friendly" they are. Regulatory agencies stopped the crackdown and instead talked about "clear regulatory frameworks." Institutional capital flooded in, turning this movement into part of asset allocation.
In the wild growth period of the past, the very fact that it was not recognized by the mainstream was what made it most attractive. Today, the ecosystem is mature, politically correct, and制度完善—it's hard to say whether it's progress or some kind of compromise. The genuine spirit of risking everything for conviction seems to be gradually fading away.