Aragon made some bold moves back in the day. They issued a governance token alongside other specialized tokens for dispute resolution and legal matters. The whole setup was pretty unconventional—mixing standard governance with arbitration mechanisms built into the token structure. It was an interesting experiment in decentralized dispute resolution, though it didn't exactly go smooth. The community had mixed reactions to how they rolled it out and the token mechanics involved. Worth digging into if you're curious about early DAO governance experiments.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Token_Sherpa
· 4h ago
tbh aragon's token soup back then was basically a masterclass in what NOT to do with incentive design... mixing governance + arbitration into one tokenomic mess? that's velocity trap 101. the real question nobody asked: did the utility actually justify the issuance or were they just slapping "decentralized" on ponzinomics and calling it innovation
Reply0
rekt_but_vibing
· 4h ago
Aragon's approach is indeed bold, directly embedding the arbitration mechanism into the token... Speaking of which, these early developers really dared to innovate, but what happened later? The community's reaction was underwhelming, right?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 4h ago
Haha, Aragon's move is basically playing a "love triangle" with tokens—governance, arbitration, and legal as three wives serving one token. And the result? Still a crash [dog head]
Laughing as I lose everything on this one, the early DAO experiments are all full of pitfalls.
Aragon made some bold moves back in the day. They issued a governance token alongside other specialized tokens for dispute resolution and legal matters. The whole setup was pretty unconventional—mixing standard governance with arbitration mechanisms built into the token structure. It was an interesting experiment in decentralized dispute resolution, though it didn't exactly go smooth. The community had mixed reactions to how they rolled it out and the token mechanics involved. Worth digging into if you're curious about early DAO governance experiments.