Has the dev team considered implementing a token buyback and burn strategy? This mechanism could help strengthen the tokenomics by reducing circulating supply over time. Many successful projects have adopted similar approaches to create deflationary pressure and potentially benefit long-term holders. What's the team's stance on this type of mechanism, and is it something on the roadmap?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImaginaryWhale
· 20h ago
Buyback and burn sounds good, but it seems that most projects are just talk, how many can actually be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStaking
· 20h ago
I'm tired of hearing the same rhetoric about buybacks and burns; I just want to ask, has it actually been implemented?
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinArbitrageur
· 20h ago
The destruction mechanism... Even if you put it nicely, it all depends on real cash flow. Just talking nonsense is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 20h ago
Buyback and destruction have been played out long ago; what really matters is whether the team has enough cash flow to support it.
Has the dev team considered implementing a token buyback and burn strategy? This mechanism could help strengthen the tokenomics by reducing circulating supply over time. Many successful projects have adopted similar approaches to create deflationary pressure and potentially benefit long-term holders. What's the team's stance on this type of mechanism, and is it something on the roadmap?