Last month, I invested in a small-cap project, set up the contract address and wallet authorization, and was just waiting for the launch. But what happened? I just transferred 5000U, and suddenly the DApp front end froze, with MetaMask constantly throwing errors. At that moment, I was really panicked—cold sweat soaked through my back, and all kinds of worst-case scenarios flashed through my mind.

I trembled as I refreshed the page for half an hour, my heart almost jumping out of my chest. Three seconds later, on-chain data appeared: the U in my wallet was intact, not a penny less. It turned out that only the front end crashed; my principal in the contract was safely sitting there. Looking at those numbers, I suddenly understood— in this market, "stability" might actually be the most practical thing.

Why are more and more people starting to reconsider stablecoins? There are indeed some logical reasons worth pondering.

**The Double-Edged Nature of Stablecoins**

When it comes to stablecoins, many people think of them as "boring, no yield." But now, the way stablecoins are used has changed—taking some mainstream stablecoins as examples, they are over-collateralized with more than 130% of hard assets (BTC, TRX, etc.), keeping their price basically pegged at $1. It sounds conservative, but in certain ecosystems, adding them to liquidity mining often yields annual returns of over 10%. Compared to the 0.3% interest from bank savings, this difference is significant and more reliable than constantly worrying about crypto price swings.

**Practical Ecosystem Applications**

More realistically, when you participate in various DeFi operations within Tron or other ecosystems, the stability of stablecoins becomes evident—they won't suddenly evaporate due to market volatility, risks are manageable, and you can still earn some yield. For those looking to maintain liquidity in a bear market and deploy quickly in a bull market, this is a good choice.