Looking at the recent movements of whales, I think this wave of ZEC might really have a chance.
Someone has been touting that ZEC could rise to 10,000 U per coin, and I’ve adjusted my confidence level accordingly. The highest it reached was only 750 U, then it fell back to three or four hundred. Recently, after a period of dormancy, I noticed big players quietly accumulating or transferring to cold wallets. This signal is worth paying attention to.
I’ve always adhered to a principle: don’t listen to what whales say, watch what whales are doing. As Buffett said — buy where no one is paying attention, sell where everyone is loud. Remember the incident with Chen Zhi and Qian Zhi Min, who held a total of 240,000 BTC? At that point, ZEC skyrocketed to 750. That was definitely a bustling stage. Now, with the market entering winter, everyone is shouting that a bear market is coming, which has led to a scene of no one paying attention. From this perspective, ZEC indeed has a big turnaround potential.
Why are privacy coins a necessity? The reason is simple. Decentralization has a clear advantage: no regulatory restrictions, transparent on-chain data. But the problem is — many people actually want data privacy. That’s the true value of privacy coins.
My judgment is: privacy coins are definitely a necessity, and the more the cryptocurrency ecosystem develops, the more prominent the importance of privacy coins becomes. Especially for those with assets, regardless of the source of their money, privacy protection is needed.
As the leader in privacy, XMR has excellent technology, but taking privacy to such an absolute level is too extreme. The result is — any country might ignore it or treat it coldly. But if you make privacy too "absolute," it can easily become a target for crackdown by various countries. From this logic, ZEC might instead have the chance to become a new leader.
Why not DASH? DASH’s ambition isn’t in privacy itself, but in privacy payments as an application scenario. Payments are the future, and this track’s potential far exceeds that of pure privacy concepts. DASH won’t abandon its core focus on payments to pursue privacy alone, which limits its development direction. In comparison, ZEC has the chance to become an absolute leader; reaching 10,000 U is just a matter of time.
DASH’s prospects are actually even more aggressive because payments are a real necessity — any fund flow requires privacy protection. If ZEC hits 10,000 U, DASH could at least reach 1,000 U. The privacy track is truly full of opportunities.
But the problem is: the volatility of privacy coins is also fierce. A change in regulatory sentiment could cause a 90% crash directly. Those without strong psychological resilience should probably stay away from the privacy coin concept.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ThreeHornBlasts
· 14h ago
Whale accumulation, what does it indicate? It suggests that the bottom might really be in.
A regulatory crackdown that cuts straight through—if your psychological resilience isn't strong enough, you can't really play with privacy coins.
10,000U? First, keep your mindset steady, don't get cut again.
ZEC is basically a gamble on national policies; if you guess wrong, it hits the bottom directly; if you guess right, that's where the money is.
Privacy coins are popular, but a single policy can wipe out everything. I can't bear this kind of risk.
What whales are doing is more interesting than what they say, but we also need to see how much we can earn, right?
Buffett's theories in the crypto world are sometimes just gambling on luck—don't over-mythologize it.
Payments are the real king; I really have a bit of interest in the DASH logic.
Are there opportunities everywhere in the privacy track? But everywhere also means risks—let's see who can survive until the end.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborer
· 14h ago
I do believe in whales stockpiling... but the figure of 10,000U really needs to be discounted.
Once regulation comes, it will be cut in half, privacy coins are that damnable.
ZEC's current opportunity is indeed there, but you need to have a strong heart.
The previous wave at 750 definitely had many people... now no one asks, which is the real signal.
The payment track is indeed more valuable than pure privacy, even the author admits this.
Privacy coins are too volatile; one ban and it's over. Do you dare to go all in?
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leaker
· 14h ago
I also saw the whale accumulation signals, but ZEC hitting 10,000? This guy just said earlier that the discount operation resulted in a huge loss...
A 10x increase is just for listening, privacy coins can be cut in half by a regulatory storm, I think I'll stay on the sidelines.
By the way, that part about DASH is contradictory—first saying its limitations, then saying its prospects are even more promising? That logic needs to be sorted out.
Privacy is indeed a necessity, but if you ask me who can survive the longest, XMR is too tough, DASH is too decentralized, and ZEC feels a bit awkward in its position.
Looking at this accumulation signal, it does seem interesting, but I don't dare go all-in on privacy coins... the risk is really extreme.
Looking at the recent movements of whales, I think this wave of ZEC might really have a chance.
Someone has been touting that ZEC could rise to 10,000 U per coin, and I’ve adjusted my confidence level accordingly. The highest it reached was only 750 U, then it fell back to three or four hundred. Recently, after a period of dormancy, I noticed big players quietly accumulating or transferring to cold wallets. This signal is worth paying attention to.
I’ve always adhered to a principle: don’t listen to what whales say, watch what whales are doing. As Buffett said — buy where no one is paying attention, sell where everyone is loud. Remember the incident with Chen Zhi and Qian Zhi Min, who held a total of 240,000 BTC? At that point, ZEC skyrocketed to 750. That was definitely a bustling stage. Now, with the market entering winter, everyone is shouting that a bear market is coming, which has led to a scene of no one paying attention. From this perspective, ZEC indeed has a big turnaround potential.
Why are privacy coins a necessity? The reason is simple. Decentralization has a clear advantage: no regulatory restrictions, transparent on-chain data. But the problem is — many people actually want data privacy. That’s the true value of privacy coins.
My judgment is: privacy coins are definitely a necessity, and the more the cryptocurrency ecosystem develops, the more prominent the importance of privacy coins becomes. Especially for those with assets, regardless of the source of their money, privacy protection is needed.
As the leader in privacy, XMR has excellent technology, but taking privacy to such an absolute level is too extreme. The result is — any country might ignore it or treat it coldly. But if you make privacy too "absolute," it can easily become a target for crackdown by various countries. From this logic, ZEC might instead have the chance to become a new leader.
Why not DASH? DASH’s ambition isn’t in privacy itself, but in privacy payments as an application scenario. Payments are the future, and this track’s potential far exceeds that of pure privacy concepts. DASH won’t abandon its core focus on payments to pursue privacy alone, which limits its development direction. In comparison, ZEC has the chance to become an absolute leader; reaching 10,000 U is just a matter of time.
DASH’s prospects are actually even more aggressive because payments are a real necessity — any fund flow requires privacy protection. If ZEC hits 10,000 U, DASH could at least reach 1,000 U. The privacy track is truly full of opportunities.
But the problem is: the volatility of privacy coins is also fierce. A change in regulatory sentiment could cause a 90% crash directly. Those without strong psychological resilience should probably stay away from the privacy coin concept.