Jumping into heavy marketing before you've actually nailed product-market fit? That's basically waving a red flag about what your real priorities are. Take a look around—you'll notice some projects are throwing sponsorship deals left and right while others are still grinding on core fundamentals. Lighter's been plastering their name all over the place compared to Hyperliquid's more measured approach. Meanwhile, Vechain locked down a multi-year UFC sponsorship deal. The question worth asking: are these teams actually confident their product sticks, or are they just trying to create noise before users realize the gaps?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MemeCurator
· 14h ago
Really, small projects are the easiest to expose themselves. Spending money on marketing is like saying, "Our product isn't good enough, so we have to hype it up."
This move by Light is indeed a bit rushed. Compared to the dullness of Hyperliquid, they actually came out ahead.
That UFC deal sounds impressive, but user retention is the real key to success.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoy
· 14h ago
Nah, this is a classic case of putting the cart before the horse. Spending money on marketing without building a solid product will only be exposed once users start using it.
View OriginalReply0
just_here_for_vibes
· 14h ago
Marketing first, then product. I've seen this trick too many times. To put it plainly, it's just guilt.
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 14h ago
Burning money on marketing is really saying "My product isn't good enough"... Lighter's recent move truly can't hold up anymore
View OriginalReply0
ThatsNotARugPull
· 14h ago
NGL, seeing these projects spend money on marketing recklessly is just annoying, they haven't even perfected the product but are already doing sponsorships... Isn't this just closing your ears to steal bells?
---
Lighter's recent actions are truly outrageous. Instead of flooding screens every day, they should spend time on the product.
---
UFC sponsorships are so expensive, where does the money come from... Do users really want to pay for this? I can't see it.
---
Yeah, projects that are truly confident have long focused on refining their products. There's no need to make such a fuss.
---
Hyperliquid's low-key approach actually gives me a sense of reassurance... Lighter really got it wrong.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhale
· 14h ago
Doing product development first and then marketing is common sense. The approach of throwing money and reputation at Lighter seems really exhausting to watch.
Jumping into heavy marketing before you've actually nailed product-market fit? That's basically waving a red flag about what your real priorities are. Take a look around—you'll notice some projects are throwing sponsorship deals left and right while others are still grinding on core fundamentals. Lighter's been plastering their name all over the place compared to Hyperliquid's more measured approach. Meanwhile, Vechain locked down a multi-year UFC sponsorship deal. The question worth asking: are these teams actually confident their product sticks, or are they just trying to create noise before users realize the gaps?