2025-12-20 08:40:40

#大户持仓动态 Market observers point out that PUPPIES did not emerge out of nowhere. This project consolidates the core spirit of previously popular dog-themed cryptocurrencies such as DOGE, SHIB, FLOKI, and others—representing community consensus-driven narrative power. Interestingly, PUPPIES to some extent is a collision and fusion of the "Love Series" and "Dog Series" IP concepts, aiming to establish its own differentiated positioning within the $ETH ecosystem.

$DOGE $SHIB $FLOKI $ETH

DOGE6,98%

SHIB11,85%

FLOKI17,61%

ETH1,01%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FancyResearchLab

· 2025-12-23 02:03

Another variant of shitcoin, this time with an "Love Series" shell added... Theoretically, it should work, right? But let me try this differentiated positioning first, doing a small experiment to see how long it can last.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSquirter

· 2025-12-20 19:45

Another dog coin variant, huh? This time, just changing the IP shell to tell a new story? --- PUPPIES riding the hype is quite familiar, the DOGE narrative can be used for years --- Wait, can this really sell in the $ETH ecosystem? Seems unbelievable --- Community consensus-driven... honestly, it's still about retail investors taking the hit --- IP collision and fusion sound impressive, but why does it feel like the next zero-value coin? --- I've seen many dog-themed coins, but why can this one break through? --- Haha, everyone has learned to tell stories. Let's wait and see who will take the final baton.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 2025-12-20 15:14

Is it another Dogecoin merge? It feels like just hype about the concept.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightMEVeater

· 2025-12-20 09:11

Another patchwork monster of a dog-themed coin, good morning to all nocturnal creatures. DOGE, SHIB, FLOKI—what's the core spirit? Honestly, it's just the cyclical reuse of liquidity traps. This time, they’re using a different IP skin to continue the cut. --- Still researching this at 2 a.m., really bored. Differentiated positioning? I just want to see which wallet will become the next target of a sandwich attack. --- Honestly, every time it’s the same narrative, driven by community consensus... Haha, once the gas wars start, you'll see who’s a true believer and who’s just arbitraging. --- PUPPIES = DOGE + SHIB + FLOKI at the top of the food chain? No, it should be a new liquidity trap menu, waiting for midnight diners. --- Another round of the robot playground is opening, good morning everyone. IP collision and fusion sound so fancy, but as I always say—time cost is the most expensive. --- I’ve seen this routine too many times, just re-skinning and repeating. Really want to see what tricks big players are playing in dark pool trading. --- Good morning, at 4 a.m., I want to say, the term differentiated positioning is really clever. It’s basically about finding new price impact points within the ETH ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletAnxiety

· 2025-12-20 09:10

Another "fusion" concept dog coin, it all sounds like just storytelling.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMonger

· 2025-12-20 09:07

nah the "narrative fusion" angle is just cope for lacking actual tokenomics... DOGE community built something through chaos, SHIB had the liquidity play, FLOKI rode the hype cycle. puppies copying the formula without understanding the *why* behind each governance model? weak move. ETH ecosystem doesn't need another memecoin with borrowed credibility tbh

Reply0

GweiWatcher

· 2025-12-20 08:51

It's another dog-themed coin riding the hype; isn't this trick played out already?

View OriginalReply0

SighingCashier

· 2025-12-20 08:46

Another dog-themed coin? Come on, this is just riding the hype. DOGE has been around for so many years and is still being speculated on.

View OriginalReply0