#AI行业整体 Seeing this topic, I thought of an interesting phenomenon: many people regard AI and robots as the "saviors" of the economy, as if technological progress can automatically solve all problems. But QwQiao's point hits the nail on the head—technological revolutions over the past few centuries have not changed the long-term trajectory of per capita GDP growth. What does this imply?

**Technology changes the way we produce, but it cannot change the choices of economic policies.**

No matter how advanced the AI revolution is, it cannot change monetary policy. When a country faces debt difficulties, the test is not how advanced the technology is, but how rational the institutional design is. The reality that printing presses keep turning actually hints at a question: what we need to reflect on is not what AI can do, but the sustainability of the economic system itself.

This is also why I am more optimistic about the Web3 concept. The exploration of decentralized finance, the governance experiments of DAOs—these are attempts to reconstruct incentive mechanisms and trust foundations through technological means. It’s not that blockchain can solve all economic problems, but at least it offers a new approach—**making rules more transparent, dispersing power, and giving participants a voice**.

In other words, we cannot just rely on technological progress; we also need to find ways to upgrade the system. This is precisely where Web3’s greatest value lies.