These past two years, I've been pondering a question — it seems our industry has been hijacked by "performance."
Everyone is talking about how the underlying public chains need to be faster and cheaper, almost like a religion. But on second thought, is that really what blockchain needs?
Looking back at the development path over the years, it's quite interesting. During the 2018 public chain wars, everyone was competing on TPS and block times. And what was the result? The damn thing still failed. In this cycle, the focus shifted to Layer 2, another round of performance competition. Now, a new batch of high-performance public chains has emerged again, and it feels like history is repeating itself.
But after all these years, performance has become increasingly crazy — transactions are cheaper, and speeds are faster — so what’s the outcome? The ecosystem isn’t as prosperous as imagined. What does this tell us?
Perhaps the problem isn’t performance itself. Blindly piling up performance metrics is like constantly adding horsepower to a car without considering where it’s headed. We need to think about whether high performance truly addresses user pain points or if it’s just hype.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropAutomaton
· 12-20 03:28
Exactly right. Over the years, it's really just been a performance number game. Anyway, if the ecosystem doesn't take off, it won't take off. No matter how fast the chain is, it can't save projects that no one uses.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetFreeloader
· 12-20 03:12
That's right, this round of performance arms race is really outrageous. No matter how high TPS is, without real-world application scenarios, it's all pointless.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuy
· 12-20 03:12
You're absolutely right. Performance competitions are really a false proposition; they're just self-congratulation.
The ecosystem is the real key. Without an ecosystem, what's the use of being fast?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 12-20 03:10
It's quite a harsh truth—no matter how high the TPS, the ecosystem remains so quiet, which is indeed a bit embarrassing.
These past two years, I've been pondering a question — it seems our industry has been hijacked by "performance."
Everyone is talking about how the underlying public chains need to be faster and cheaper, almost like a religion. But on second thought, is that really what blockchain needs?
Looking back at the development path over the years, it's quite interesting. During the 2018 public chain wars, everyone was competing on TPS and block times. And what was the result? The damn thing still failed. In this cycle, the focus shifted to Layer 2, another round of performance competition. Now, a new batch of high-performance public chains has emerged again, and it feels like history is repeating itself.
But after all these years, performance has become increasingly crazy — transactions are cheaper, and speeds are faster — so what’s the outcome? The ecosystem isn’t as prosperous as imagined. What does this tell us?
Perhaps the problem isn’t performance itself. Blindly piling up performance metrics is like constantly adding horsepower to a car without considering where it’s headed. We need to think about whether high performance truly addresses user pain points or if it’s just hype.