The market is once again swinging in the realm of sentiment. Recently, pessimistic forecasts about ETH have been flying everywhere, with statements like "dropping to $1,400 by 2026" appearing frequently. But a close look at the candlestick chart tells a different story.
From a technical perspective, this correction from the all-time high can be considered healthy. The price is gradually testing the $2,200-$2,300 zone, a demand area that has been validated multiple times in the past and truly acts as support. Many investors are starting to accumulate in batches here, waiting for the next upward wave. This is not a sign of collapse, but rather a buildup.
Experienced traders wouldn't panic at this point. They know that panic often creates opportunities. When the price is near support levels, calmly entering in stages, setting proper risk controls, and waiting for a rebound to the $3,000 or even $4,500 target zone before considering exiting—that's the right approach.
But there's a hidden issue worth pondering. You might have precisely calculated the return on investment for entering at $2,300, but have you considered what your invested funds are doing during this "waiting for reset" period? They might be generating returns elsewhere on other opportunities, while you are just standing guard here. This is called opportunity cost. In highly volatile markets, this invisible expense is often overlooked.
The key is to recognize your own strategy: are you engaging in short-term swing trading or mid-term positioning? Are you purely betting on a rebound or optimistic about long-term development? Different answers mean completely different operations. The difference between blindly waiting and calmly analyzing lies right here.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RunWithRugs
· 12h ago
You are absolutely right about opportunity cost; most people haven't really calculated the true cost of standing guard.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrant
· 12-21 07:59
The concept of opportunity cost is indeed spot on; many people calculate returns but do not consider sunk costs, resulting in a waste of the time value of capital.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHunter
· 12-20 02:52
The part about opportunity cost really hit home; the time cost of funds just sitting idle is easily overlooked.
View OriginalReply0
GasGasGasBro
· 12-20 02:49
The opportunity cost part is really harsh; by the time ETH comes around, the money on other chains would have already been earned back...
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 12-20 02:46
The opportunity cost has indeed been underestimated; the cost of keeping funds on standby is more painful than the decline itself.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 12-20 02:34
The opportunity cost part is really well explained. I'm the kind of person who calculates a $2,300 profit, but ended up missing out on that wave of Solana... Now I'm a bit regretful for standing guard.
The market is once again swinging in the realm of sentiment. Recently, pessimistic forecasts about ETH have been flying everywhere, with statements like "dropping to $1,400 by 2026" appearing frequently. But a close look at the candlestick chart tells a different story.
From a technical perspective, this correction from the all-time high can be considered healthy. The price is gradually testing the $2,200-$2,300 zone, a demand area that has been validated multiple times in the past and truly acts as support. Many investors are starting to accumulate in batches here, waiting for the next upward wave. This is not a sign of collapse, but rather a buildup.
Experienced traders wouldn't panic at this point. They know that panic often creates opportunities. When the price is near support levels, calmly entering in stages, setting proper risk controls, and waiting for a rebound to the $3,000 or even $4,500 target zone before considering exiting—that's the right approach.
But there's a hidden issue worth pondering. You might have precisely calculated the return on investment for entering at $2,300, but have you considered what your invested funds are doing during this "waiting for reset" period? They might be generating returns elsewhere on other opportunities, while you are just standing guard here. This is called opportunity cost. In highly volatile markets, this invisible expense is often overlooked.
The key is to recognize your own strategy: are you engaging in short-term swing trading or mid-term positioning? Are you purely betting on a rebound or optimistic about long-term development? Different answers mean completely different operations. The difference between blindly waiting and calmly analyzing lies right here.