2025-12-20 01:18:26

A certain Web3 project recently proposed a new token expenditure plan, intending to use up to 5% of its token reserves to support the development of its USD stablecoin ecosystem, which caused a stir in the community.

Supporters of the plan believe it makes sense—by incentivizing partners to participate deeply, it can leverage the long-term value of the entire ecosystem and is beneficial for the project's future.

However, there are also many objections. Many token holders worry that once this 5% of tokens enters the market, it will be difficult not to put pressure on the price. What’s more concerning is that currently about 80% of the tokens are locked, and if these holders see unlocked tokens causing a dump, they will still have to hold onto their frozen assets. How do you account for that?

In essence, this is a typical game between ecosystem development and the protection of token holder interests. Short-term incentives versus long-term stability—whether the community can find that balance may determine the project's future direction.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RektButSmiling

· 2025-12-22 07:46

It's the same old story again, first making promises and then dumping? I just want to ask what those 80% of locked-up people are thinking.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 2025-12-21 08:59

Another trap? The promised ecological construction, in the end, it's just playing people for suckers.

View OriginalReply0

P2ENotWorking

· 2025-12-20 19:09

Another new trick to fleece retail

View OriginalReply0

DuskSurfer

· 2025-12-20 01:45

It's the same old story, using ecological construction as an excuse to dump, I'm tired of hearing it. Still daring to move inventory with 80% locked, aren't they afraid of a blow-up later? If these 5% really flow out, it's a miracle if the price stays stable; it's already peaked. Motivating partners? Ha, I think it's just motivating them to cash out. The question is, can the community truly exert influence, or will they be cut again?

View OriginalReply0

CommunitySlacker

· 2025-12-20 01:39

Here comes the old trick of harvesting profits again. 5% may not sound like much, but the selling pressure is really intense.

View OriginalReply0

DeadTrades_Walking

· 2025-12-20 01:38

It's the same old story, releasing tokens for "ecosystem development," sounds nice, but it's just dumping the price again.

View OriginalReply0

GasBandit

· 2025-12-20 01:36

It's this old trick again, crazy pressure release in the name of ecological construction, the eve of a typical project party cutting leeks

View OriginalReply0

OnchainSniper

· 2025-12-20 01:33

This proposal is a dead end. Who can guarantee it won't drop after a 5% dump? It's the same old trick, secretly cashing out under the guise of ecosystem development. Daring to move 5% of the inventory with 80% locked? Isn't this digging a pit? It's been obvious all along that these project teams never considered the feelings of the token holders. They call it incentives, but in reality, it's just an excuse for cashing out.

View OriginalReply0

ContractTester

· 2025-12-20 01:33

It's the same old story, first crashing the market and then talking about the ecosystem. Wake up, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

SmartMoneyWallet

· 2025-12-20 01:32

5% may not seem like much, but have you calculated the actual on-chain liquidity? These manipulators are masters of wordplay.

View OriginalReply0