Bridging and true swapping are actually quite different
New-generation DEXs like Pact promote a simple idea that most infrastructure has long avoided:
✓ Use only native assets ✓ Reject synthetic and wrapped assets ✓ Do not package bridging risks as user experience optimization
What does this mean? Bitcoin is Bitcoin, Ethereum is Ethereum, BNB is BNB—no derivatives, no middlemen. Assets are executed on the chain where they reside, and interactions are completed there.
It may seem like a detail, but it actually touches on the core pain point of current cross-chain interactions. Most bridging solutions, in order to improve liquidity and convenience, introduce synthetic assets and wrapped tokens. While this seems to solve liquidity issues, it secretly shifts technical risks onto users. Pact’s approach returns to the essence: exchanging with native assets, with transparent and controllable risks.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BloodInStreets
· 12-19 22:01
The synthetic asset approach is just transferring the risk to retail investors; true traders have long seen through it. Pact's idea is actually about doing subtraction, which makes it more valuable.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKing
· 12-19 21:57
Exactly, this is what I've been wanting to say all along. When I was arbitraging before, I suffered a lot from bridging issues. All kinds of wrapped tokens are really tricky, and the risks are entirely borne by the users themselves.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTrapper
· 12-19 21:57
actually if you read the contracts on these "native asset" dexes... they're still wrapping, just differently. calling it a day too early imo
Reply0
CodeAuditQueen
· 12-19 21:41
This is the right way. Finally, someone has torn open the wrapping paper. Other bridging solutions are just doing risk laundering, playing tricks to deceive people.
Bridging and true swapping are actually quite different
New-generation DEXs like Pact promote a simple idea that most infrastructure has long avoided:
✓ Use only native assets
✓ Reject synthetic and wrapped assets
✓ Do not package bridging risks as user experience optimization
What does this mean? Bitcoin is Bitcoin, Ethereum is Ethereum, BNB is BNB—no derivatives, no middlemen. Assets are executed on the chain where they reside, and interactions are completed there.
It may seem like a detail, but it actually touches on the core pain point of current cross-chain interactions. Most bridging solutions, in order to improve liquidity and convenience, introduce synthetic assets and wrapped tokens. While this seems to solve liquidity issues, it secretly shifts technical risks onto users. Pact’s approach returns to the essence: exchanging with native assets, with transparent and controllable risks.