2025-12-19 16:25:58

The 50% unlock fee debate surrounding MemeMax_Fi deserves a closer examination. Look beyond the surface—this mechanism is actually quite ingenious from a protocol design perspective.

What's the real function here? First, it drives trading activity and keeps capital flowing throughout the MemeCore ecosystem. Second, and more importantly, it acts as a natural filter. It weeds out the short-term farmers chasing quick gains while rewarding genuine long-term participants who believe in the ecosystem.

This creates a self-selecting community. You're not just holding—you're committing. The friction isn't a bug; it's a feature that strengthens the protocol's sustainability and aligns incentives properly.

M-3.59%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenDreamer

· 12-19 16:58

Nah, this 50% design is really fierce; those who understand the protocol can see it's not a trap. --- Basically, it's about filtering people. Farmers are directly discouraged, haha. --- I like the saying "Friction is a feature"; it's much better than those brainless fee reductions. --- Really, long-term holders are the backbone of the ecosystem. This mechanism is exactly for that purpose. --- Wait, so is this a covert way to incentivize loyalty? I have to say, it's a bit shady. --- Wow, 50% really dares to make a move, but from a design logic perspective, it does hold water. --- I'm just worried it's another mechanism disguised as a design to cut the grass... --- Thinking about it this way, high friction can actually help cultivate true believers. Clever!

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentTherapist

· 12-19 16:58

50% unlock fee? Basically, it's just pushing farmers out, with a wolfish attitude. --- Friction is just filtering; I've heard this argument too many times. In the end, it's always the big players laughing to the bank. --- Hold tight, long-term holding = getting trapped? I just want to know who is actually making money. --- From the perspective of protocol design... isn't this just a disguised lock? It’s packaged quite nicely. --- Wait, does this logic imply that if I got cut, it's because I didn't commit enough? That's a bit ridiculous. --- A community of self-selected members... Wow, dismissing retail investors so grandly. --- I just want to ask, did early big V influencers also pay a 50% fee to unlock?

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 12-19 16:55

50% unlock fee sounds harsh, but once you truly understand it, it's a different story... Basically, it's about shaking off those retail investors who want to quick buy and sell. Those who stay are the true believers, and this logic isn't flawed. The protocol design really has substance; it's not just a simple brute-force way to make money. Friction itself is a feature; the natural selection mechanism is excellent. Holding becomes a commitment, and this is what Web3 should look like, thumbs up. This design indeed controls people's greed. It's called filtering in a nice way, but honestly, it's locking up tokens... but in the long run, it might really benefit the ecosystem. The mechanism is a bit harsh but logically clear, I am optimistic. Short-term pain, long-term gain—it's all about whether you can endure it.

View OriginalReply0

NotAFinancialAdvice

· 12-19 16:45

Hey, this 50% unlock fee sounds intense, but thinking about it carefully, there's actually some logic to it. Using friction to filter people—this move is pretty clever. Basically, it's about making short-term players leave and keeping true believers, right? I have to admit, I kind of respect this design logic... even though it seemed crazy at first. Rather than calling it a trap, it's more like a commitment filter. Thinking about it this way, it suddenly doesn't seem so brainless. True believers vs. farmers—it's obvious who sees through it, nice.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-3824aa38

· 12-19 16:40

Honestly, a 50% ratio is a bit aggressive, but on second thought, isn't this just pushing away those leeks who only want to cash out quickly?

View OriginalReply0

FastLeaver

· 12-19 16:38

A 50% fee... Basically, it's just filtering out the newbies, clever. NGL, this design does have some merit, it's not just about cutting. People with true conviction stay, while the sheep farmers get kicked out, and the ecosystem purity increases. I'm just worried that most people simply can't hold on, and in the end, it all goes to zero. So is this not a bug, but a feature? I'm convinced.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#2025GateYearEndSummary
23.1K Popularity
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWinGoldenBar
29.7K Popularity
#GateLaunchpadKDK
27.32K Popularity
#FedRateCutPrediction
80.99K Popularity
#ETHTrendWatch
193.84K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
MP信托Международный Трастовый Фонд
MC:$3.6KHolders:4
0.17%
2
MCMargin Call
MC:$3.55KHolders:1
0.00%
3
BitpizzaBitpizza
MC:$3.6KHolders:2
0.13%
4
GAIAGAIA
MC:$20.63KHolders:2055
52.35%
5
GMONEYGMONEY
MC:$3.54KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap