New Uniswap Proposal Targets All V3 Pools and 8 New Networks

UNI-0,25%
ETH-2%
ARB-2,48%
CELO-3,27%
  • Uniswap plans to activate protocol fees on all v3 pools using a tier-based system for faster governance updates.
  • The proposal expands protocol fees to eight networks, routing revenue back to Ethereum for UNI token burning.
  • Governance will vote through two parallel proposals due to action limits in the onchain voting system.

Uniswap governance is considering a major protocol fee expansion. A new temp check proposal, authored by Erin Koen, wants to activate fees on all v3 pools on the Ethereum mainnet. It also aims to bring protocol fees to eight additional chains.

The proposal marks the first use of Uniswap’s new streamlined governance process approved under UNIfication. If it passes, the changes could reshape how Uniswap collects and burns UNI across multiple networks.

Uniswap’s Fee Rollout Moves to More Chains

The proposal targets Arbitrum, Base, Celo, OP Mainnet, Soneium, X Layer, Worldchain, and Zora. Each chain would receive both v2 and v3 protocol fees. Fees collected on these chains flow into a TokenJar contract on each respective network.

From there, UNI gets bridged back to Ethereum mainnet and sent to a burn address. The same infrastructure already handles Unichain sequencer fee burns, according to the proposal.

Koen notes that the earlier fee rollout on Ethereum mainnet went well. Market-adjusted TVL on mainnet has risen since December. The burn system has also been working as expected, converting fees from many different tokens into UNI burns without requiring manual steps.

A Tier-Based System for All V3 Pools

One of the bigger changes in this proposal is how v3 fees get managed. Today, the v3FeeAdapter handles fees pool by pool. Governance maintains a running list of individual pools and their fee levels. This proposal replaces that setup with a new v3OpenFeeAdapter.

The new adapter sets protocol fees uniformly across all pools that share the same LP fee tier. Any new pool automatically gets the default protocol fee for its tier. No separate governance action is needed for each pool.

For example, all pools with a 1 basis point LP fee could have protocol fees set at 25%. Governance still retains the ability to override fees on specific pools if needed.

The proposal also introduces a faster path for fee updates. Under UNIfication, fee parameter changes skip the RFC stage entirely.

They go straight to a five-day Snapshot vote, followed by an onchain vote. This cuts down the time needed to make adjustments while keeping onchain security intact.

Due to GovernorBravo’s limit of 10 actions per proposal, the onchain vote will split into two parallel proposals. One will cover mainnet changes plus Base, OP Mainnet, and Arbitrum. The other will handle Celo, Soneium, Worldchain, X Layer, and Zora.

The temp check is currently active in the Uniswap governance forum. Community members can weigh in before the proposal moves to a Snapshot vote.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Uniswap Crosses $1T in Layer-2 Volume As “Pink Acceleration” Gains Momentum

Uniswap Labs is back with another eye-catching milestone, this time highlighting the scale of activity flowing through layer-2 networks on the Uniswap Protocol. In a post shared by the team, Uniswap said L2 swap volume has crossed the $1 trillion mark, pairing the message with the phrase “Pink

BlockChainReporter2h ago

Hyperliquid Is Worth 10x Uniswap Despite Generating Similar Fees: Here’s Why That’s Interesting

Uniswap and Hyperliquid are generating roughly the same amount in fees. Over the past 180 days, both protocols sit around $400 million in fee revenue according to Token Terminal data. That is where the similarity ends. Hyperliquid’s fully diluted market cap is around $38 to $40 billion. Uniswap is c

BlockChainReporter18h ago

Uniswap Official Explains How DAOs Would Actually Make Sense

Uniswap’s Head of Policy discussed the conditions under which DAOs are practical and those in which they’re not. The Uniswap official highlighted that DAOs make sense for institutions that prioritize governance distribution, but not for those that value speed in decision-making and enforcing

Blockzeit23h ago

SafePal Integrates Uniswap to Enhance With In-Wallet Swaps

SafePal has partnered with Uniswap to enhance in-wallet token swapping, providing deeper liquidity and a smoother DeFi experience. This integration allows users to trade directly from the SafePal wallet, reducing reliance on centralized exchanges and improving security.

BlockChainReporter03-19 05:04

Uniswap adds support for the stablecoin public chain Tempo and launches a multi-token payment feature

Gate News reports that on March 19, Uniswap added support for stablecoin public chain Tempo. Meanwhile, the "pay with any token" feature in Uniswap API and Tempo machine payment protocol has officially launched and is now available.

GateNews03-19 04:01
Comment
0/400
No comments