Lending Protocol ZeroLend Can't Hold On! TVL Vanishes 98%, Remaining $6.6 Million, Three Years of Operation Can't Withstand Chain Exhaustion

COMP-0,48%
AAVE-1,7%
MANTA1,4%

Decentralized lending protocol ZeroLend announced on February 16th that after three years of operation, it will cease all business activities. The team stated that multiple early-supported blockchains have become inactive or experienced significant liquidity shrinkage, oracle providers have stopped support, and frequent hacker attacks have led to long-term losses that make continued operation impossible. ZeroLend’s TVL has plummeted from a peak of nearly $359 million to just $6.6 million, a decrease of over 98%.
(Background: What is modular lending, and will it become the next DeFi hotspot?)
(Additional context: Detailed explanation of DeFi lending “liquidation mechanisms”: risk overview of Compound, Maker, AAVE)

Table of Contents

  • The Four Main Causes of Death: Chain Depletion, Oracle Disruption, Hacker Attacks, Zero Profits
  • TVL Dropped from $359 Million to $6.6 Million
  • Some Funds May Be Trapped: Attention for Manta, Zircuit, XLayer Users
  • The Harsh Reality of DeFi Lending

Multi-chain decentralized lending protocol ZeroLend issued an official announcement on February 16th, revealing a “difficult decision”—to terminate the protocol after three years of operation. The team admitted that the protocol has been in long-term loss and cannot sustain operations under multiple pressures. Currently, most market loan-to-value ratios (LTV) have been set to 0%, effectively prohibiting new borrowing, and only allowing users to withdraw funds.

The Four Main Causes of Death: Chain Depletion, Oracle Disruption, Hacker Attacks, Zero Profits

ZeroLend detailed four reasons for its closure in the announcement:

  • Support chains become inactive: Several early deployed blockchains supported by ZeroLend have become inactive or experienced significant liquidity shrinkage, rendering the protocol’s operations on these chains essentially meaningless.
  • Oracle providers cease support: Disruption of price data sources directly impacts the core lending and liquidation mechanisms of the protocol.
  • Increase in hacker and scam attacks: The inherently high-risk nature of lending protocols makes them frequent targets for attacks.
  • Thin profit margins lead to long-term losses: The profit space for lending protocols is extremely limited; combined with the above pressures, the situation worsens.

TVL Dropped from $359 Million to $6.6 Million

According to data from DefiLlama, ZeroLend’s total value locked (TVL) peaked at nearly $359 million in November 2024, but has since declined sharply, now remaining around $6.6 million, an evaporation of over 98%. This data vividly reflects the liquidity exhaustion across multiple chains.

Some Funds May Be Trapped: Attention for Manta, Zircuit, XLayer Users

ZeroLend strongly recommends users withdraw remaining funds from the platform as soon as possible via the official app. However, not all users can withdraw smoothly—on chains like Manta, Zircuit, and XLayer, where liquidity has severely deteriorated, some funds are currently locked and tied to inactive positions.

The team stated that solutions are being developed for these affected assets, including executing time lock upgrades to reallocate funds. However, specific timelines and details have not yet been announced, and whether trapped users can recover their full funds remains uncertain.

The Harsh Reality of DeFi Lending

ZeroLend’s collapse is not an isolated case but a reflection of the brutal reshuffling in the DeFi lending space. In this sector, major protocols like Aave and Compound already dominate most of the market share. Smaller protocols struggle to survive in a razor-thin profit margin environment, while also facing high maintenance costs across multiple chains, oracle dependency risks, and ongoing security threats.

For users holding assets on ZeroLend, the immediate priority is to withdraw funds from the platform and closely monitor any subsequent announcements regarding solutions for trapped assets.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Scallop Lend 完成 Asymptotic 全面形式化验证

Gate News 消息,3 月 15 日,Scallop Lend 已完成由 Asymptotic(Mysten Labs 官方审计合作伙伴)进行的全面形式化验证。该验证确认了协议核心机制的数学正确性,包括核心记账逻辑、清算计算、访问控制以及定点数运算等关键模块。

GateNews54m ago

Aave 回應五千萬鎂 Swap 事故:用戶誤接受 99.9% 價格衝擊,Aave 將推出 Shield 防護機制

去中心化借貸協議 Aave 最近發布事故報告,說明 3 月 12 日一名用戶在其平台上進行大額 Swap 交易時,由於市場流動性不足,最終只獲得約 3.6 萬美元的 AAVE。Aave 強調該事件非因協議漏洞,而是用戶接受了極端不利報價,並計劃推出新的安全機制 Aave Shield 以降低未來誤操作的風險。

ChainNewsAbmedia1h ago

以太坊基金會場外出售 5000 枚 ETH 給 BitMine,Tom Lee:以太坊正處小熊市末期

以太坊基金會宣布透過場外交易向BitMine出售5,000枚ETH,平均價格為2,042.96美元,總值約1,022萬美元。出售所得將用於支持協議研發、生態建設及社區資助。BitMine持有ETH總量已增至約453萬枚,朝向掌握全球5%供應量的目標邁進。

動區BlockTempo2h ago

USDH 发行方 Native Markets 推出代币化保证金产品 pmUSDH

3月15日,Hyperliquid原生稳定币USDH的发行方Native Markets推出了代币化保证金产品pmUSDH,用户可将存入的USDH转化为ERC-20格式的pmUSDH。该代币不仅可获取借款利息,还能在多个DeFi协议中使用。

GateNews2h ago

Aave 就「将年回购预算从 5000 万美元下调至 3000 万美元」进行投票,当前支持率 99.37%

Aave DAO 正在对将年度回购预算从 5000 万美元下调至 3000 万美元的提案进行投票,当前支持率为 99.37%。提案因收入下降和预算赤字而提出,若通过将进入正式投票阶段。

GateNews3h ago

Vitalik 解读以太坊基金会新使命:将加倍投入并推动其成为"技术避风港"

Vitalik Buterin在X平台解读以太坊基金会的新使命宣言,强调以太坊作为“技术避风港”的独特角色,致力于维护技术自我主权,防止绝对控制,并推进CROPS原则,关注去中心化与用户体验,以推动以太坊生态发展。

GateNews3h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments