Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Ken Sim's Bitcoin Plan for Vancouver Faces Legal Roadblock
Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim’s ambitious proposal to invest municipal reserves in bitcoin has hit a significant legal barrier. A city staff report, released ahead of an upcoming March council meeting, concludes that the plan directly violates existing provincial and municipal regulations, making it impossible for the city to proceed with direct bitcoin holdings.
Why Vancouver Mayor’s Initiative Cannot Proceed
Ken Sim’s motion to transform Vancouver into a “bitcoin-friendly city” contradicts established investment rules. City staff determined conclusively that under the Vancouver Charter, bitcoin does not qualify as an allowable investment asset. The restriction is not new—it reflects decades-old municipal finance law designed to protect public funds through conservative investment practices.
The legal barrier extends beyond Vancouver’s own charter. British Columbia’s Municipal Finance Authority Act reinforces these limitations, establishing a narrow framework for how municipalities can deploy idle funds. Current regulations permit investment only in fixed-income instruments and cash equivalents: federal and provincial government securities, municipal bonds, bank deposits, and highly rated commercial paper.
The Legal Framework Blocking Municipal Bitcoin Holdings
Section 201 of the Vancouver Charter spells out precisely which assets qualify. Stocks, commodities, and cryptocurrencies are explicitly excluded from eligible securities lists. This reflects a regulatory philosophy prioritizing capital preservation over growth—a framework built when digital assets barely existed.
The framework governing municipal investment pools is similarly restrictive. Eligible securities are limited to bonds, debentures, deposit certificates, and promissory notes. These requirements exist across Canada’s municipal system, making Vancouver’s situation representative of broader provincial constraints rather than a localized restriction.
A Possible Workaround: Immediate Currency Conversion
The staff report leaves one narrow door slightly ajar. Vancouver might still pursue the “bitcoin-friendly city” branding goal through an alternative approach: accepting cryptocurrency for municipal taxes and fees, provided bitcoin is immediately converted into Canadian dollars upon receipt.
This technical distinction separates payment processing from investment regulation. While the charter strictly governs how city funds are invested, it may not control how payments are received and processed. However, city officials have not yet confirmed whether this pathway would satisfy either the motion’s original intent or survive further legal scrutiny.
Institutional Bitcoin Accumulation Continues Elsewhere
While Vancouver cannot invest public reserves in BTC, institutional appetite for bitcoin remains robust. A major strategy this year has accumulated 89,618 BTC, bringing total holdings to 761,068 BTC as of recent updates. The previous quarter saw even more aggressive purchases—194,180 BTC added during Q4 2024 alone as bitcoin climbed toward $100,000.
This institutional backdrop highlights the divergence between private capital’s embrace of cryptocurrency and public sector constraints. Current bitcoin pricing stands near $70,490, reflecting ongoing market volatility and institutional positioning. Vancouver’s inability to participate in this accumulation reflects not skepticism about bitcoin’s value, but rather the conservative legal guardrails surrounding municipal finance.