Many people haven't thought it through: why does the SVM ecosystem need an alternative choice? The issue isn't with SVM itself, but with the homogeneity of the entire ecosystem culture. The real answer is right in front of us — there is a completely different L1 ecosystem, ten times faster, offering a radically different development path. This is not just a simple technical comparison, but a profound reflection on the necessity of diversification in public chains. The ecosystem should give developers and users genuine options, rather than being limited by a single culture and performance ceiling. Everyone can see that real demand is surfacing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MysteryBoxAddict
· 2h ago
10 times faster? Easy to say, but let's see it actually run first.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 11h ago
10 times faster? Alright, I'll see how long this L1 can last first.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 11h ago
Speed is 10 times faster? Sounds great, but how does it perform in real-world applications? Don't tell me it's just another hype.
View OriginalReply0
GasWrangler
· 12h ago
ngl the "10x speed" claim is doing a lot of heavy lifting here... if you actually analyze the data, transaction throughput isn't just raw speed, it's about settled finality and MEV extraction costs. demonstrate the actual mempool pressure differential before talking about alternatives
Reply0
ApeWithAPlan
· 12h ago
Well said, ecological monopoly is indeed a problem, but whether the speed is 10 times faster depends on the actual application scenario.
View OriginalReply0
BrokeBeans
· 12h ago
The ecosystem needs to come together to be interesting; sticking to a single path should have been broken long ago.
Many people haven't thought it through: why does the SVM ecosystem need an alternative choice? The issue isn't with SVM itself, but with the homogeneity of the entire ecosystem culture. The real answer is right in front of us — there is a completely different L1 ecosystem, ten times faster, offering a radically different development path. This is not just a simple technical comparison, but a profound reflection on the necessity of diversification in public chains. The ecosystem should give developers and users genuine options, rather than being limited by a single culture and performance ceiling. Everyone can see that real demand is surfacing.