#UNI代币销毁 Seeing the recent moves by Uniswap, I need to analyze calmly. Burning 100 million UNI tokens, zero fees across the board, and even auctioning liquidity provider rewards—sounds great, but over the years I've seen too many "good news" turn out to be signals for a market squeeze.

To be honest: protocol token burns are inherently positive and can indeed improve the tokenomics. But the key issue is whether these benefits are being hyped prematurely. I've seen too many projects announce good news, see their prices spike, only to crash afterward—because the market has already digested the good news, and what follows is often a wave of bagholders entering.

Zero fees also need to be looked at carefully. While it's beneficial for users and LPs, how will Uniswap sustain its ecosystem development costs? In the long run, if they rely on some new profit model, we need to watch whether they’re just digging new pits. My lesson is that before any major change, you should consider the project's true intentions.

My simple advice: don’t rush to chase after these announcements. Let the market run a cycle first, wait until the hype cools down, and then decide based on actual implementation. Once UNI burns and the fee mechanism are truly in place, then it’s time to reevaluate. Until then, stay alert and don’t let FOMO cloud your judgment.

The key to long-term on-chain survival is: be cautious with good news and focus on actual execution.