2026-01-11 15:25:32

KAIO is about to迎来TGE, but can the data really support the expectations?

According to Root Data, KAIO's performance over the past year has been quite good—the growth indicators and heat score show a continuous upward trend, indicating that market attention is gradually heating up. However, the most intuitive metric is still the fundraising data: a financing scale of $11M reflects the investors' recognition of the project.

But the question is, can a promising growth curve translate into actual platform usage and ecosystem activity? Good-looking data before TGE doesn't necessarily mean the hype can be maintained after launch. It is worth continuing to observe whether KAIO's actual application scenarios are sufficiently essential and whether user retention rates can exceed the industry average in the same track.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainFortuneTeller

· 23h ago

Funding looks good, but whether it truly launches successfully still depends on retention... We've seen this kind of tactic too many times in previous years.

View OriginalReply0

GraphGuru

· 23h ago

They all look good before TGE, but the key is whether they can retain users after launch. I bet it will cool off like most projects.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 23h ago

11M in funding sounds sexy, but what are the real use cases? That's the key. --- No matter how loud the hype before TGE, there are many projects that drop the ball after launch. --- Good data ≠ a good product; how many lessons does it take to understand this? --- Recognition from investors ≠ user acceptance; retention rate is the true litmus test. --- I’m already tired of seeing beautiful growth curves. --- Wait, what exactly is KAIO’s actual use case? I haven’t seen it clearly. --- 11M is okay, but with such a competitive track, what can really stand out? --- The three months after TGE are the real test period. --- Another funding story, but what about ecosystem activity? --- Honestly, I’m not very interested in the "average level in the same track" comparison.

View OriginalReply0