2026-01-11 12:45:00

Wait a minute, when performance and cost are both leveled out, who still cares about which chain you're using? Privacy.

This is not just about security upgrades. The real key is—once user data privacy is protected within an ecosystem, the cost of migration skyrockets. This kind of user stickiness is harder to break than any performance metric.

But the key is how to do it. Those centralized privacy solutions? They should have been phased out long ago. Truly sustainable privacy infrastructure must be decentralized and trustless. From the communication layer to the data layer and then to the application layer, the entire chain must support this architecture. Only then is privacy not just a marketing concept, but a real moat.

In the next few years, privacy infrastructure will become a critical indicator of a chain's survival. Projects that don't keep up with the pace will soon be marginalized.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiVeteran

· 17h ago

Well said, I am extremely impressed with the idea of privacy as a moat. True differentiation lies here. Centralized privacy solutions should have died long ago; projects still touting them are basically hopeless. Chains without privacy infrastructure will be eliminated sooner or later; that's a hard threshold. If privacy isn't thoroughly implemented, user stickiness is all just superficial, it's nonsense. Who truly implements decentralized privacy will be the real winner. This is the true competitive edge; performance and other aspects are actually less important. The next wave will depend on whose privacy infrastructure is solid; everything else is just a supporting role.

View OriginalReply0

LowCapGemHunter

· 01-11 13:14

In plain terms, privacy is the true moat, and the centralized system should have died long ago.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxBuster

· 01-11 13:11

That's right, privacy is the true moat, and the centralized systems should have been gone long ago. --- This analysis has some substance... No wonder some chains are getting anxious now. --- Wait, are you saying that decentralized privacy infrastructure still needs to be divided into three layers? Are there any projects that have actually achieved this now? --- User stickiness is indeed absolute; once privacy is in place, it's really hard to migrate. --- To be honest, most projects' privacy solutions are just for show, looking impressive but ineffective.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationAlert

· 01-11 13:03

Privacy, yes, but how many can truly achieve decentralized privacy? It's all just on paper. To be honest, most projects nowadays just use privacy as a gimmick to fleece users. A moat is nonsense, and user stickiness is even more ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

OnChain_Detective

· 01-11 13:02

nah hold up... centralized privacy schemes? pattern analysis suggests those got rugpulled faster than most shitcoins tbh. only trust-minimized architectures survive long-term, everything else is just marketing theater imo

Reply0

HashRatePhilosopher

· 01-11 12:57

Alright, this is the next watershed moment. Privacy will truly become the last trump card to retain users. The centralized privacy approach should have died long ago, honestly. Only full-chain support from communication to application layer is meaningful; otherwise, it's all empty talk. Without a decentralized privacy chain, these years will just be waiting to be swept away.

View OriginalReply0