SOL surged from 1000U to 30,000U. In the same market conditions, some accounts doubled, while others kept losing money. Where does this gap come from?



Most contract traders make very typical mistakes — when prices rise, they go all-in; when prices fall, they panic buy more to rescue the market. As a result, even if their market direction is correct in the end, their accounts have already been liquidated due to volatility. This is not trading; this is gambling.

A friend's trading logic is quite interesting. He emphasizes one point: principal is the safety net, profit is the growth engine. The principal must be as solid as a rock, so that profits can snowball and grow exponentially.

His specific approach is as follows — with an account of 1000U, he initially invests only 200U to test the market. If he earns 50U, he doesn't immediately add more; instead, he uses that 50U to open a second position. If the market continues smoothly, he repeats this rolling process; but once he senses a potential reversal, he stops immediately. What's the benefit of this? Even if there's a pullback, only the profits are lost, and the principal remains fully protected.

This is true position scaling, not the kind of all-in play that gets triggered by market anger.

In contrast, those who lose often do so at these key points: they get caught and then panic buy more, sinking deeper; they misjudge the trend and stubbornly hold on, ending up doubting life; after a few wins, they start to get inflated, lose control emotionally, and end up with a complete liquidation.

A more cautious operational logic unfolds like this:

**Initial Stage** — Use small positions to test and quickly gauge the current market temperament.

**Confirm the trend** — Once the trend direction is clear, consider increasing profit investments.

**Progressive scaling** — When the price continues to rise, add another layer of position.

**Exit timing** — When key resistance levels break or sideways signals appear, consider taking profits and exiting.

There are also techniques for taking profits. It’s not about closing all positions immediately after a profit, but moving the stop-loss line upward as the market rises. This locks in some profits while still leaving room for further upside. When approaching critical technical levels, you can sell half of your position first, leaving the other half to run freely. This approach ensures the safety of the principal and keeps the opportunity for big gains.

Some may ask if this method really works. In the crypto market, stability is indeed the most core competitive advantage. Opportunities are always present, but those who truly seize them are often not the luckiest, but the ones who control the rhythm most steadily.
SOL2,54%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NoodlesOrTokensvip
· 20h ago
Exactly right, but it's hard to execute. Those around me who are making money are indeed following this logic, while I, who go all-in on bullish bets, have already been liquidated.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidatorvip
· 20h ago
Basically, it's about controlling emotions. The group of people who went all-in with full positions have long been out of the game.
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfervip
· 20h ago
That's quite true, but I think most people will still go all-in after reading because that's human nature.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawervip
· 20h ago
Speaking of which, my friend also played like this before, and it really was very stable. The group of people who went all-in are still losing money; he already cashed out, it's that simple. This set of theories sounds comfortable, but it's easy to get called out when executing. Profit on top of profit, sounds great, but I'm just worried that one wave of profit might disappear. Only those who can protect their principal are the real winners; everyone understands this logic. It's the same old rhetoric, but the question is, can they really stop when the market reverses? I just want to know if this guy eventually got liquidated too. Taking profits in batches is a solid strategy; I just can't do it myself. Making money in the crypto world relies on stability, not talent—I believe that. It all sounds right, but what about when the market doesn't follow the usual patterns?
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobiavip
· 20h ago
Honestly, those who go all-in and gamble are just asking for it, just like a gambler's mentality. Look clearly, steady compound interest is the way to go, not relying on luck to double your money. Protect the principal, let the profits grow—this logic is indeed brilliant. I was also taught by a margin call; now I prefer small-scale trial and error. The key is to control emotions and not let the market lead you by the nose. The biggest enemy of human nature is greed. After a few wins, people start to get carried away. It's time to wake up. Gradually increasing the position size sounds easy, but sticking to it is damn hard. Profit-taking is indeed a matter of skill; closing all at once and taking profits in batches are worlds apart. That's how the crypto world is—those who get the rhythm right make money, while the reckless end up in the hospital.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDayvip
· 20h ago
That's right, the full position all-in strategy should have been thrown in the trash long ago, it's just a gambler's mentality. --- Protecting principal is really fundamental; most people die here. --- I've tried the logic of opening trades with rolling profits; it's definitely more comfortable than going all-in in one shot. --- I feel this friend is reliable, but the problem is that very few people can actually do it. --- Haha, that's how the crypto world is. People who know how to make money earn a lot, while those who don't lose everything. --- I think the tactic of moving the take-profit line to adjust the stop-loss depends on the market; it's not a universal solution. --- The saying that controlling the rhythm is more important than luck really hits the mark; it's true. --- People who constantly see full positions get liquidated—think more about whether you're being greedy. --- Trying with a small position first and then increasing—sounds easy, but actually doing it is super hard; psychological resilience is lacking. --- In this wave of SOL, some people doubled their money, while others got liquidated; the gap is just so big.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)