Taking the PUMP project as an example, with daily revenue reaching around 1 million USD, the annual income would be approximately 400 million USD. In traditional financial markets or any mature market, a company with an annual revenue of 400 million USD would typically have a market value of around 10 billion USD to be considered a reasonable valuation. But what is the current situation? In the cryptocurrency market, which is touted as the most speculative and most efficient in pricing, this company's valuation is stuck at only 2 billion USD.
Honestly, this phenomenon is quite worth pondering. Either the market has insufficient recognition of the project's cash flow capabilities, or there is a distortion in the entire valuation system itself. On one side, there is the solid annual revenue of 400 million USD; on the other side, the market's valuation is only one-fifth of the traditional market theoretical value. This huge gap reflects that the crypto market indeed exhibits some abnormal phenomena in asset pricing. The atmosphere is heavily speculative, but the fundamental valuation logic is actually more relaxed.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 01-11 00:41
Damn, the valuation gap is really outrageous. Has the market not reacted yet?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbie
· 01-10 14:48
Wait, a 2 billion valuation with only a fivefold PE? This is totally a bargain.
View OriginalReply0
MetaLord420
· 01-10 03:35
Laughing out loud, the PUMP valuation is indeed outrageous, how is 2 billion enough?
View OriginalReply0
TokenSleuth
· 01-10 02:38
This is just outrageous. What's the point of a 2 billion valuation? I really can't grasp the logic of the crypto market.
View OriginalReply0
MoonMathMagic
· 01-10 02:37
Bro, I keep thinking there's something wrong with this logic.
Is it really possible to apply traditional financial valuation models?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 01-10 02:36
Wow, a 2 billion valuation and pretending to have an annual revenue of 400 million? This market really has some issues.
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflict
· 01-10 02:26
Haha, this is the magic of the crypto market. No one believes the numbers are real.
Wait, according to this logic, PUMP should be taking off, so why is it still stuck at 2 billion...
Honestly, the market just doesn't want to value cash flow, it just wants to gamble on the next narrative.
It's really ironic; the more they claim to have efficient pricing, the more they get slapped in the face.
View OriginalReply0
PoolJumper
· 01-10 02:22
Now we've really struck gold, PUMP's annual revenue of 400 million has been cut by three-fourths. Can anyone explain?
Taking the PUMP project as an example, with daily revenue reaching around 1 million USD, the annual income would be approximately 400 million USD. In traditional financial markets or any mature market, a company with an annual revenue of 400 million USD would typically have a market value of around 10 billion USD to be considered a reasonable valuation. But what is the current situation? In the cryptocurrency market, which is touted as the most speculative and most efficient in pricing, this company's valuation is stuck at only 2 billion USD.
Honestly, this phenomenon is quite worth pondering. Either the market has insufficient recognition of the project's cash flow capabilities, or there is a distortion in the entire valuation system itself. On one side, there is the solid annual revenue of 400 million USD; on the other side, the market's valuation is only one-fifth of the traditional market theoretical value. This huge gap reflects that the crypto market indeed exhibits some abnormal phenomena in asset pricing. The atmosphere is heavily speculative, but the fundamental valuation logic is actually more relaxed.