DuskTrade's interesting aspect is not just that it's another RWA concept wrapper; the key lies in the backing party, NPEX Exchange, which is a legitimate entity—holding multiple official licenses such as EU MTF and brokerage licenses. What does this mean? It means operating within a regulatory sandbox from day one, not doing something first and then seeking compliance.
This kind of partnership model can legitimately bring over €300 million in traditional financial assets onto the blockchain, which is a true breakthrough in breaking down dimensional barriers. It's not a gray-area "we ask for permission first and then act," but an extension built on existing financial frameworks. For investors, the feeling of being "protected by regulation" is indeed more reassuring than wild RWA projects.
In the long run, as the scale of on-chain assets and their integration with traditional finance deepen, these bridge-type applications with official identities will become increasingly valuable. It's not to say that tokens will definitely rise, but this model itself is proving to be sustainable.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerRugResistant
· 19h ago
Oh, so this is the gameplay, not those wild RWA projects.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiHarvester
· 01-10 01:53
This is the real deal, not those pie-in-the-sky RWA projects. NPEX has a legitimate license backed by real funds, with 300 million euros—no small amount.
Prioritizing compliance is indeed rare; most projects run first and ask questions later. This guy is doing it the other way around.
But to be honest, even with compliance, it depends on whether assets can truly be migrated onto the chain in the future. Having a license alone is useless.
If this model can really be implemented successfully, it’s definitely worth paying attention to—much more reliable than those wild RWA projects.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 01-10 01:44
Wow, NPEX's licensing gameplay is indeed fierce. According to on-chain data, the TVL growth rate of this type of compliant RWA is often 3-5 times higher than wild projects. Risk warning is here— but from three perspectives, how long the compliant shell can last is still an issue.
View OriginalReply0
HashRatePhilosopher
· 01-10 01:43
The official team entering the scene is truly different. Finally, I see someone taking the license seriously.
View OriginalReply0
degenonymous
· 01-10 01:25
This is the kind of thing I want to see, not those wild projects that get investigated every other day. Having a license really makes a difference.
DuskTrade's interesting aspect is not just that it's another RWA concept wrapper; the key lies in the backing party, NPEX Exchange, which is a legitimate entity—holding multiple official licenses such as EU MTF and brokerage licenses. What does this mean? It means operating within a regulatory sandbox from day one, not doing something first and then seeking compliance.
This kind of partnership model can legitimately bring over €300 million in traditional financial assets onto the blockchain, which is a true breakthrough in breaking down dimensional barriers. It's not a gray-area "we ask for permission first and then act," but an extension built on existing financial frameworks. For investors, the feeling of being "protected by regulation" is indeed more reassuring than wild RWA projects.
In the long run, as the scale of on-chain assets and their integration with traditional finance deepen, these bridge-type applications with official identities will become increasingly valuable. It's not to say that tokens will definitely rise, but this model itself is proving to be sustainable.