Recently, when looking at the AI companionship track, I feel there are still many ideas that need to be clarified.



The true companionship experience should be built on real-time interaction, especially immersive interaction methods like voice conversations. However, to achieve such functionality, there is an unavoidable issue—the content of every user dialogue needs to be recorded and processed. This is completely different from simple text interactions, as now most AI systems can handle text, so the difference is minimal.

The key difference lies in the fact that voice interactions involve more user privacy data. How to find a balance between ensuring service quality and protecting privacy is an unavoidable design challenge for any project aiming to differentiate itself in this track.

Some projects want to pursue this direction, but with the dual considerations of technology and ethics in front of them, only a few can truly do it well.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MaticHoleFillervip
· 01-07 09:35
Privacy is indeed a bottleneck; once voice data is on the blockchain, it can't be undone. Don't rush into it before you have a clear plan.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapistvip
· 01-07 09:24
Voice companionship is indeed a bottleneck, and no one can bypass the privacy concerns.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 01-07 09:21
The voice feature is indeed a pitfall; privacy and user experience are always at odds.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt