Yesterday, I woke up to see a certain emerging project's token plummeting from 3 million to 500,000. I wondered what was going on. After asking around, I finally understood — it turns out that the executives of this project were also involved in promoting a certain pet coin, even active on social media in the middle of the night, directly boosting that dog coin.



I took a closer look at the co-founders of the project and counted five of them. That’s even more outrageous. Think about it, with so many co-founders, who knows how many "dogs" and small projects are behind the scenes. If you're not careful, someone might be secretly manipulating their own small tokens, siphoning off the popularity and traffic from the main project.

If such things really happen in project governance, it’s a huge pitfall for ordinary investors. I suggest that projects like this should properly regulate the external behavior of team members, and not let personal projects and official projects get mixed up, or trust will really take a big hit.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCriervip
· 15h ago
It's another team self-sabotaging scheme; five co-founders aren't enough, they need each person to raise a few more dogs.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 01-07 06:54
It's the same old story; more joint ventures don't bring good things.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatchervip
· 01-07 06:53
This is a typical power vacuum, with five co-founders each harboring their own schemes.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntressvip
· 01-07 06:52
Five co-founders, this number alone should serve as a warning bell. Through research and analysis, this structure is most prone to hiding problems.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleeplessvip
· 01-07 06:46
This is just a dice, five co-founders acting as if no one is in charge
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLuckyvip
· 01-07 06:45
Five co-founders? As soon as I saw that number, I knew it wasn't a good sign. It's obviously just multiple heads managing a disorganized team.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrantvip
· 01-07 06:43
Bro, I've seen this kind of move many times before. Five co-founders is just ridiculous. --- 300 million down to 50 million... I knew someone was playing both sides again. --- Honestly, this kind of team structure is the easiest to cause trouble. No one needs to take responsibility, right? --- A project with five "fathers," no matter who it is, everyone gets confused. --- I just want to know how much this guy made pushing dog coins in the middle of the night. Doesn't he have any sense? --- This is the real rug pull, a legitimate and legal version. --- With so many co-founders, there are probably N more small projects hidden behind the scenes. --- Trust level? Bro, it's gone completely. --- It's the same old trick. Looks very professional but is actually a mess. --- May I ask which project it is? I want to avoid it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)