2026-01-06 23:22:54

Ordinals completely changed people's perception of Bitcoin last year and also sparked this wave of meme enthusiasm. Under this trend, many new projects have begun exploring innovative token incentive models.

Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon on BSC — some projects have adopted a distributed transaction trigger mechanism. Each transaction not only involves value transfer but also triggers propagation logic on the chain. In other words, every transaction you make participates in the ecosystem's growth feedback, and token holders' gains are no longer passive waiting but naturally earned through active market participation.

This logic is quite interesting. Compared to traditional static holding models, this mechanism links participation and rewards. The more frequent the transactions, the more active the ecosystem, and the stronger the support for the token's value. From a certain perspective, it’s more like turning the entire community into a self-optimizing network — the more participants, the lower the unit participation cost.

Of course, the risks and opportunities of such innovative projects are equally apparent. But for those who value ecosystem engagement and long-term growth, this new approach indeed offers a different realm of imagination.

ORDI-2,46%

BTC-1,56%

MEME-2,25%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DataOnlooker

· 3h ago

Sounds like a new trick to cut leeks again, the more you trade, the more you make? Wake up, that's just encouraging you to trade every day. Basically the same old story: whoever invests early makes money, those who come later are just bagholders. I've heard a lot about this "self-optimizing network" theory, and they all seem similar. In the end, it just depends on who can run faster. If I was confident, I would have gone all in long ago, but it is indeed a bit interesting, I’ll keep an eye on it. There are so many projects like this on BSC, but how many can actually survive more than a month?

View OriginalReply0

TaxEvader

· 01-06 23:53

Trading is mining, sounds great, but what about in reality? Nice words, but isn't it just another scheme to cut the leeks again? The projects on BSC are getting more and more elaborate with their tactics. Lower participation costs? Why does it feel like gas fees have actually gone up? Ordinals did wake up a lot of people, but meme coins fade quickly after the hype. Feels a bit like marketing brainwashing. Distributed trading triggered? After all the circling, it's still the whales cutting in. It just feels like rephrasing liquidity mining. As expected from BSC, they can innovate in anything.

View OriginalReply0

MissingSats

· 01-06 23:49

It's the same old story of trading and mining again. Sounds good, but when the price drops, the true nature is revealed. --- No matter how fancy the mechanism design on BSC is, in the end, it still depends on whether the team is reliable. --- Wait, the more frequent the transactions, the more profits? Isn't this just encouraging pump and dump? --- Feels like a new skin for Ponzi schemes. High participation = easy price manipulation. --- It's interesting, but I don't believe projects like this can survive the next bear market. --- Speaking of which, ordinals have definitely awakened many people, but most innovations on BSC have become tools for harvesting. --- Self-optimized network? Brother, you're flattering yourself. It's just liquidity mining with a different name.

View OriginalReply0

ContractTearjerker

· 01-06 23:48

Trading is mining, this gameplay sounds good, but it’s easy to turn into a game of hot potato. After Ordinals, they dare to innovate on everything, but this time it’s really a bit promising. Once again, I need to trade frequently to make a profit, a business of taking fees? Got it.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterX

· 01-06 23:37

Another "trading equals mining" scheme, sounds very appealing but can it really work out? Frequent trading = increased profits, this logic is a bit too idealistic, right? The BSC meme wave is indeed crazy, but it's always better to be cautious. The heat around Ordinals is on a completely different level; these new mechanisms are still far away. So basically, it's encouraging people to trade wildly; the more they trade, the more they lose. I've heard similar claims about self-optimizing networks since last year, but what was the result? Things that seem good often hide the greatest risks. Does anyone really make money from this, or is it just another scheme to fleece the retail investors?

View OriginalReply0

MetaEggplant

· 01-06 23:31

Trading is mining, sounds good, but it's easy to get liquidated. Honestly, it still depends on whether there is a genuine user base. There are too many projects on BSC, so you need to be cautious. This logic has been played out long ago; they just rebrand and come back. But it is indeed more interesting than just holding coins and lying flat.

View OriginalReply0