I used to not pay much attention to oracles, just treating them as background systems. Until that one time, I saw a protocol's code was perfectly fine, but because the price feed data was delayed by a few seconds, it ended up trapping users. That moment made me realize: smart contracts don’t play polite—they execute exactly according to the information they receive.
This led me to a deeper question—the blockchain itself is essentially blind. It has no idea what the outside world’s prices are, what the weather is like, or any real-world information. The so-called trustlessness depends on the data fed into it being reliable.
But what is reality? Too many oracles treat data as mere numbers, completely unaware of how chaotic the real world is—exchanges occasionally malfunction, APIs get stuck, and when certain tokens have low liquidity, quotes can be outrageously off. Pursuing the idea of getting "correct" data from a single source is fundamentally flawed.
The truth isn’t just a cold, hard number; it’s a verification process.
Recently, I’ve been paying attention to APRO because its approach directly targets this chaos. It doesn’t obsess over the accuracy of a single data source; instead, it has designed a continuous verification and consensus mechanism. The system cross-checks data from multiple angles, remains alert to outliers, and focuses on the temporal patterns of data rather than snapshots at a single moment.
Two design details are particularly worth mentioning:
**1. Dual Mode of Push and Pull**
This is not just a functional parallel but a shift in mindset. The Push mode sends updates at regular intervals like a heartbeat, making it especially suitable for lending protocols and perpetual contracts where price data is needed every second. The Pull mode acts like a readily available notary office, querying data only when truly necessary, which is more economical for less frequent interactions.
**2. Rigor in Data Verification**
It’s not simply pulling prices from multiple exchanges; it involves layered validation of the data itself. Outlier detection, rationality checks on time series, and comprehensive liquidity considerations—all integrated into standard system procedures.
In essence, APRO aims to solve a fundamental contradiction: executing incorrect information perfectly is less valuable than ensuring the information being executed is reliable. In front of smart contracts, there’s no room for ambiguity or "I didn’t mean to." Once the price feed is flawed, the consequences are users’ funds.
This is also why oracle security often becomes the weak link in the entire ecosystem. Blockchains can be hacked, and oracles can be compromised. But blockchain attacks are technical against technical; oracle issues are problems with the information itself—this hurdle is even harder to cross.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PerpetualLonger
· 1h ago
A delay of just a few seconds in price feed can cause liquidation—that's what I fear the most, even more terrifying than a hacker attack.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivor
· 2h ago
A few seconds of price feed delay can wipe out users, this is truly a horror story.
Being a few seconds late and it's game over, this setup is perfect... Looks like the oracle is the real killer.
The code has no issues but users are still trapped, hilarious. This is the magical aspect of DeFi.
Push-pull dual mode sounds good, but as the old saying goes—reliability of the information source itself is the key.
APRO's multi-angle verification approach is much smarter than simply pulling exchange prices.
The blockchain is like a blind person—this analogy is perfect. It all depends on the oracle, the eyes.
Good anomaly detection can indeed avoid many pitfalls, but the premise is that this mechanism can't be bypassed.
Poor liquidity makes quotes outrageous to the point of frightening, this is the most real sentence I've ever heard.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayer
· 01-04 21:51
Another article titled "I Discovered the Truth About Oracles"—whether it's telling the truth or not, multi-chain verification is the only way to be truly assured.
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflict
· 01-04 21:37
Being a few seconds late can get users trapped, which is why I now have a bit of PTSD when I see oracles.
View OriginalReply0
SelfStaking
· 01-04 21:36
Damn, this is the money I lost recently. I'm so pissed off.
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefather
· 01-04 21:35
My buddy is right, oracles are really easy to underestimate. A delay of just a few seconds can bankrupt someone, it's truly terrifying when you think about it.
I used to not pay much attention to oracles, just treating them as background systems. Until that one time, I saw a protocol's code was perfectly fine, but because the price feed data was delayed by a few seconds, it ended up trapping users. That moment made me realize: smart contracts don’t play polite—they execute exactly according to the information they receive.
This led me to a deeper question—the blockchain itself is essentially blind. It has no idea what the outside world’s prices are, what the weather is like, or any real-world information. The so-called trustlessness depends on the data fed into it being reliable.
But what is reality? Too many oracles treat data as mere numbers, completely unaware of how chaotic the real world is—exchanges occasionally malfunction, APIs get stuck, and when certain tokens have low liquidity, quotes can be outrageously off. Pursuing the idea of getting "correct" data from a single source is fundamentally flawed.
The truth isn’t just a cold, hard number; it’s a verification process.
Recently, I’ve been paying attention to APRO because its approach directly targets this chaos. It doesn’t obsess over the accuracy of a single data source; instead, it has designed a continuous verification and consensus mechanism. The system cross-checks data from multiple angles, remains alert to outliers, and focuses on the temporal patterns of data rather than snapshots at a single moment.
Two design details are particularly worth mentioning:
**1. Dual Mode of Push and Pull**
This is not just a functional parallel but a shift in mindset. The Push mode sends updates at regular intervals like a heartbeat, making it especially suitable for lending protocols and perpetual contracts where price data is needed every second. The Pull mode acts like a readily available notary office, querying data only when truly necessary, which is more economical for less frequent interactions.
**2. Rigor in Data Verification**
It’s not simply pulling prices from multiple exchanges; it involves layered validation of the data itself. Outlier detection, rationality checks on time series, and comprehensive liquidity considerations—all integrated into standard system procedures.
In essence, APRO aims to solve a fundamental contradiction: executing incorrect information perfectly is less valuable than ensuring the information being executed is reliable. In front of smart contracts, there’s no room for ambiguity or "I didn’t mean to." Once the price feed is flawed, the consequences are users’ funds.
This is also why oracle security often becomes the weak link in the entire ecosystem. Blockchains can be hacked, and oracles can be compromised. But blockchain attacks are technical against technical; oracle issues are problems with the information itself—this hurdle is even harder to cross.