Wild how that works, right? Regulators rack up failed audits year after year, but the moment you move a modest amount between personal wallets or send stablecoins to a friend, suddenly there's an army of compliance teams analyzing every transaction. The asymmetry is pretty striking—institutional oversight gets a pass, individual users get the microscope.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerGas
· 32m ago
A typical regulatory asymmetry, institutions go unchecked year after year, while retail investors get targeted with a single transfer... this game equilibrium is ridiculously off.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiVeteran
· 12-20 00:55
Hmm, double standards are outrageous. When big institutions mess up, no one asks questions, but we get scrutinized just for making a transfer.
View OriginalReply0
ChainDetective
· 12-20 00:52
This double standard is really amazing. Big institutions have a pile of bad debts that no one cares about, but when we transfer a coin, we're being watched to death.
View OriginalReply0
CafeMinor
· 12-20 00:30
Regulatory agencies fail audits dozens of times a year, yet we get scrutinized to death just for switching coins. This logic is mind-boggling.
Wild how that works, right? Regulators rack up failed audits year after year, but the moment you move a modest amount between personal wallets or send stablecoins to a friend, suddenly there's an army of compliance teams analyzing every transaction. The asymmetry is pretty striking—institutional oversight gets a pass, individual users get the microscope.