Honestly, going for the measured approach feels less effective than just going all-in on the bigger plays. But hey, what's my take worth anyway—probably missing something obvious here.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FlashLoanPhantomvip
· 01-07 08:52
NGL, all-in is the way to go. Conservative play is just setting your own limit. How many opportunities are you missing?
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuckvip
· 01-07 08:44
Playing it safe and conservative really isn't exciting; you still need to go all-in to have a chance. But I definitely can't think of everything.
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayervip
· 01-07 08:40
All in is really satisfying, but can it really be stable? That's what I thought too, but in the end... forget it, no need to say more.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiSherpavip
· 01-07 08:39
All in or conservative... There's really no definitive answer to this. Anyway, most people regret one of the choices, haha.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryvip
· 01-07 08:33
NGL, all-in is really satisfying, but the measured approach also makes sense... It's just that this kind of hesitation is the most uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHustlervip
· 01-07 08:28
All-in or steady progress? To be honest, we're tired of this debate. The key is whether your hand is strong enough.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)