What is the most heartbreaking reality of trading contracts? You might make five or ten correct judgments in a row, but then one loss spirals out of control, and the money you've earned plus the principal instantly evaporates. Many people, when reviewing their trades, still blame it on "wrong direction," but in reality, the real killer is poor management of "single trade loss ratio." Direction can be wrong, but once risk control collapses, there's no rescue. All risk management principles boil down to one point: ensure that each loss is small enough so that even if you make many mistakes in a row, your account can still survive.



So how do you set specific numbers? Here's the answer.

**Conservative approach: limit single trade loss to 0.5%~1% of account equity; even aggressive traders shouldn't exceed 2%**

Most traders, especially those new to contracts, still trying to find their feel, and easily swayed by emotions, should lock their risk per trade at 0.5%~1%. Those with more experience and a more mature, stable trading style rarely push single trade risk above 2% in the long run. Exceeding 3%? Then you're not really trading; to put it bluntly, you're risking your entire account to withstand market fluctuations, and sooner or later, you'll encounter a "black swan" that will wipe you out.

This sounds very conservative, but it addresses the real problem: allowing you to stay in the market even when you make frequent mistakes. The volatility of contracts won't be gentle to anyone, and it’s impossible to always have smooth sailing.

**Why must it be around 1%? Because once the drawdown is deep, it's almost impossible to turn things around**

Just do some quick calculations on how much you need to earn to recover from a drawdown:

If you lose 10%, you need about 11.1% profit to fully recover; if you lose 20%...
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
pumpamentalistvip
· 01-08 10:05
Basically, it's poor risk control. One liquidation and everything is gone; the previous profits were just a free ride.
View OriginalReply0
DataChiefvip
· 01-07 08:50
Honestly, I've been using the 0.5% strategy for a long time, and it has indeed lasted the longest. I'm just worried that beginners still hope to turn things around in one shot, only to be eliminated by a black swan event in one go.
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truthervip
· 01-07 08:49
Basically, it's a complete liquidation in one go; all the profits from the previous ten times are wasted. This is the truth about contracts.
View OriginalReply0
Blockwatcher9000vip
· 01-07 08:49
Honestly, I've heard this 0.5%-1% theory too many times, but when it comes to execution, everyone keeps making excuses to break through... Is losing 2% once really that bad? Anyway, I have good skills, and then the account gets wiped out. Risk control is like a fitness plan—everyone understands it, but nobody can stick to it no matter what.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStationvip
· 01-07 08:42
It's easy to say, but the key is to stay alive. I previously lost control of single trade risk, and a single wave brought me back to square one. Now I always stick tightly to the 1% line.
View OriginalReply0
HackerWhoCaresvip
· 01-07 08:30
Really, one black swan event can wipe out your profits for several months. Risk control is not something to be taken lightly, even if you say it a thousand times. --- Starting at 0.5% is the proper way to play; the greedy ones are all on the liquidation list. --- Exceeding 2% is a gambler's mentality; you'll be out sooner or later. --- A 20% drawdown requires a 25% gain to recover, which is why so many people die from poor risk control. --- Every time I see someone say "I stopped loss," but they get liquidated, it's actually because they didn't do proper risk management. --- Contracts are so brutal; one out-of-control moment can instantly wipe everything out, even if you made money earlier. --- My friend didn't stick to the 1% limit and ended up losing half a year's profits in one go. It was really painful. --- Honestly, living is more important than anything else; only with an account can there be a chance to turn things around.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollectorvip
· 01-07 08:26
0.5% to 1% may sound uninteresting, but it is indeed the bottom line of survival. I've seen too many people go all-in and get eliminated directly.
View OriginalReply0
FreeRidervip
· 01-07 08:23
You're right, risk control is everything. I was on the right track before but still got liquidated, and I realized that single trade size is truly the key. Now I honestly keep it at 0.5%, because staying alive is more important than making money.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt