#数字资产行情上升 $BREV This coin, many people go all-in on the contract as soon as they get started. The reason sounds noble: going all-in can hedge against volatility and is less likely to blow up.



But this is the biggest trap.

Going all-in has never been a shield for you to casually stack positions. Once combined with high leverage, the market can turn against you instantly, and the result is not just losing a few bucks, but your account being wiped out instantly. I've seen too many such disasters—having five thousand U in the account, thinking going all-in is safe, then turning around and putting over four thousand on a short position. When the market slightly jitters, you can't react in time, get liquidated directly, and there's no way to save yourself.

The key is to understand one point: the real meaning of going all-in is to give yourself a little more buffer. It’s not about risking your life fighting volatility.

With the same tenfold leverage, some people lose a bit and then exit, while others stubbornly hold on and end up losing everything. The fundamental difference isn’t the leverage itself, but how much real money you’ve actually put into that position.

A simple calculation makes it clear: with a 1,000 U account, using only 100 U to open a 50x position— even if you go against the trend and hit the stop-loss, you can exit with your account still alive; on the other hand, putting 900 U on a 10x position might look less exaggerated, but if the market moves slightly, your entire account could be wiped out.

So don’t always get caught up in questions like "How many times leverage is safe?" The real question you should ask yourself is: how much capital am I risking on this trade? Have I truly set a stop-loss? If the market turns against me, can I hold on?

I also use a full-position mode for contracts now, but there’s only one iron law: position size always comes first. Staying alive is more valuable than any profit.
BREV1.94%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FloorPriceNightmarevip
· 9h ago
That's so true. Full position is a trap; many people have fallen into it. It's the same logic again. Leverage itself isn't wrong; the problem is people's lack of clarity. I've seen too many accounts wiped out overnight, all because of greed for this wave of market movement, and then they get hammered when they turn around. Position management is truly a necessary condition for survival, no exceptions. I think this coin is pretty虚, be careful not to go all in. A thousand U with fifty times leverage and nine hundred U with ten times leverage may look similar on the surface, but the results are worlds apart. Have you set your stop-loss? If not, how dare you play contracts? Living is always more important than getting rich quickly. This phrase must be engraved in your mind.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessGweivip
· 14h ago
Same old rhetoric. Going all-in on 10x versus 50x is essentially no different—it's just different ways to die.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBustervip
· 01-08 07:02
That's right, but too many people are greedy and can't get enough, insisting on going all in right away. I've seen even more outrageous cases, like direct financing with leverage, wiping out in two weeks, unable to change account passwords.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlinvip
· 01-07 08:38
Using full leverage of ten times is gambler's mentality. I've seen too many cases of forced liquidation, going all-in and ending up with nothing.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDeniedvip
· 01-07 08:32
The difference between full leverage of ten times and fifty times is simply whether you can afford to lose or not. That's a very clear explanation.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSurvivorvip
· 01-07 08:26
Honestly, those who go all-in with ten times leverage are gambling with their lives. If they get it wrong, their accounts are finished—there's no "but" about it.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoLuckvip
· 01-07 08:22
A great strategy is also to bet everything, but always set the stop loss at entry.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDivorcervip
· 01-07 08:19
Really, "full position" is just a gimmick. Leverage is the real executioner. This makes me think of that guy who bet all 5,000 USD in one shot and was wiped out in two minutes. Truly, I'm not joking. The key is still the size of the position, not the multiplier. Those who realize this late have already lost their accounts.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 01-07 08:15
From the perspective of Token economics, this guy's risk management logic is essentially a simple application of the Kelly criterion—based on the data model in the white paper, account liquidation fundamentally reflects a misalignment of incentives. It is worth noting that the leverage choice issue in full-position mode has already been discussed in Vitalik's paper on mechanism design.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)